From: felix@crowfix.com
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Seamonkey vs Mozilla cage match round two
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 06:46:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061118144602.GA28579@crowfix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <455EBA11.3080108@gmx.de>
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:45:21AM +0100, Michael Weyersh?user wrote:
> felix@crowfix.com wrote:
> > Something else about this seamonkey vs mozilla conflict has been
> > bugging me. Why are the two even in conflict? Firefox is not in
> > conflict with either one. Can't they coexist?
> >
> Just take a close look at the history of those two packages and their
> current status and you should be able to answer that to yourself.
Sorry, that's not clear at all. It doesn't explain why the two
binaries can't coexist. The only reason I can see for not coexisting
would be if the binaries had the same name. Even that wouldn't be
avery big ibstacle, since I have both emacs (emacs-21) and cvs-emacs
(emacs-22). And why the gentoo repository cares a white, I do not
understand.
> Another thing you should be aware of: As development (and even
> bugfixing) for Mozilla has ceased quite a while ago the last release has
> a number of security bugs that are well known and wide open. Any program
> using parts of Mozilla are therefor vulnerable as well. For that reason
> you shouldn't be using Mozilla and instead switch over to Firefox or
> Seamonkey. It will be removed from the tree sooner rather than later.
I use mozilla without javascript, java, etc, which probably eliminates
most of the security problems. I'd gladly switch to seamonkey if it
were stable, but the last time I tried it, it crashed too often and
too severaly, sometimes even clobbering the entire X session so badly
I had to reboot to clear the screen. Ssh still allowed access from
other machines, but the display eas completely useless because of X's
rude departure.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-18 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-18 7:20 [gentoo-amd64] Seamonkey vs Mozilla cage match round two felix
2006-11-18 7:45 ` Michael Weyershäuser
2006-11-18 14:46 ` felix [this message]
2006-11-18 22:35 ` Homer Parker
2006-11-19 0:42 ` felix
2006-11-19 2:34 ` Michael Weyershäuser
2006-11-19 4:12 ` felix
2006-11-19 7:26 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
[not found] <1163942462.6978.6.camel@ShadowBook.Workgroup>
2006-11-19 13:21 ` [gentoo-amd64] " B Nice
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061118144602.GA28579@crowfix.com \
--to=felix@crowfix.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox