From: felix@crowfix.com
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Seamonkey vs Mozilla: pointless cage match
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:06:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061115030638.GA5341@crowfix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163483796.12837.7.camel@galileo>
I have a ~amd64 system on which I am trying to emerge world.
First, what are the proper options to pass to this command? Several
packages will not compile, and Duncan has suggested an emerge world to
clean things up. Well, right now is a good time for me ...
Second, when I try emever -pve world, I get the following complaints:
Calculating world dependencies
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ... done!
[blocks B ] kde-base/kde-env (is blocking kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.5-r5)
[blocks B ] >=kde-base/kdelibs-3.5.4-r2 (is blocking kde-base/kde-env-3-r4)
[blocks B ] www-client/mozilla (is blocking www-client/seamonkey-1.0.6)
[blocks B ] <dev-python/pygtk-2.9 (is blocking dev-python/pygobject-2.12.2)
1. What's the scoop on kde-env vs kdelibs?
2. Ditto for pygtk vs pygobject.
This happens aperiodically. Some new package obsoletes another
package, but nothing documents it, nothing tells me what to do. Do I
unmerge the existing package and install the new one? My experience
has been mixed. Sometimes I can unmerge the old package, emerge the
new package, and then re-emerge the old package ... and everything is
happy from the on. Other times there are some old packages which
still want the old package, other old packages want the new package,
and they can't coexist.
Then we come to the real annoyance,
3. Mozilla vs Seamonkey. I tried Seamonkey a couple of times, and it
crashed so often and so quickly that I reverted to mozilla. Now it
seems there are quite a few packages which insist on seamonkey and
are not satisfied with mozilla.
I use firefox, but I also use mozilla. Mozilla has a better config
interface to my tastes. I may try seamonkey again someday, but
right now, I don't want seamonkey.
Why do some packages explicitly care about seamonkey? Shouldn't
they be pretty much the same? Shouldn't the dependencies be happy
with either one?
In the meantime, is there some way to convince emerge that
seamonkey has been installed and to not get its knickers in a
twist? I suppose I could always unmerge mozilla, emerge world,
unmerge seamonkey, and emerge mozilla again, but I get tired of
having to kick out half a dozen packages like totem, gedit,
gnome-base, epiphany, etc from the ordinary updates just to get
them working.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-15 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-14 5:56 [gentoo-amd64] New ATI proprietary driver Chris Traylor
2006-11-14 9:05 ` Rob Lesslie
2006-11-14 12:56 ` Michel Merinoff
2006-11-14 15:02 ` Mark Knecht
2006-11-15 0:04 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2006-11-15 3:06 ` felix [this message]
2006-11-15 4:12 ` [gentoo-amd64] Seamonkey vs Mozilla: pointless cage match felix
2006-11-15 9:01 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-15 9:03 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-15 10:25 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2006-11-15 10:52 ` Duncan
2006-11-15 17:36 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-16 9:57 ` Duncan
2006-11-15 15:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] " felix
2006-11-15 15:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-11-15 16:04 ` felix
2006-11-15 17:28 ` Richard Fish
2006-11-15 17:10 ` [gentoo-amd64] New ATI proprietary driver Christoph Mende
2006-11-15 17:51 ` Joaquim Quinteiro Uchoa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061115030638.GA5341@crowfix.com \
--to=felix@crowfix.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox