From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GiVnc-0001m9-5R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:48:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAACj65Y023224; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:45:06 GMT Received: from shuttle.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAACj5na025658 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:45:05 GMT Received: from BA.zlin.dk (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by shuttle.zlin.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A61030037 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:45:04 +0100 (CET) From: Bo =?iso-8859-1?q?=D8rsted_Andresen?= To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Masking / qt upgrade Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:45:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <29c147bd0611100316g5d11fe93uecb7063591a6bbd3@mail.gmail.com> <20061110114853.30832f18@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <29c147bd0611100431k7d50343at8ae7d80e7cd06e01@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <29c147bd0611100431k7d50343at8ae7d80e7cd06e01@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11870812.MRVVMHu7Ra"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200611101345.04546.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> X-Archives-Salt: ec02aaff-a863-4f96-9757-ee204ef9afab X-Archives-Hash: daa3627ebfdd31c1890442c520729022 --nextPart11870812.MRVVMHu7Ra Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 10 November 2006 13:31, Lorenzo Milesi wrote: > On 11/10/06, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > You only masked qt-4.2.1-r1, not qt-4.2.1, so the same error occurs. Put > > oe of these in /etc/portage/package.mask > > Actually I have 4.2.1 installed! > > > ~x11-libs/qt-4.2.1 > > > > >x11-libs/qt-4.2 > > > > The first masks all revisions of qt-4.2.1, the second masks everything > > greater than 4.2, which is the more brutal approach. > > I just need to mask -r1, as it's the upgrade which failes dep. Why > should I mask all the 4.2.1? The version you have installed had the dbus use flag disabled. Now the dbus= =20 use flag has been readded to both of qt-4.2.1{,-r1}. You've added qt-4.2.1 = to=20 your package.unmask so now you need to either disable the dbus use flag or= =20 add dbus to package.unmask also. =2D-=20 Bo Andresen --nextPart11870812.MRVVMHu7Ra Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFVHRQ8/kKEzmwNNoRAsavAJ9y+o36dxxtayZXMz/E0pcXeywF4gCgxvGK E3W5e2bWuVkWsPF9O9KlSyo= =0L8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11870812.MRVVMHu7Ra-- -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list