public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:06:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611061506.32157.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611061359.33291.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>

On Monday 06 November 2006 12:59, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Monday 06 November 2006 13:49, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:05:31PM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > lets ask the other way round. Why should it speed up anything to have
> > > X>number of cores?
> >
> > To account for I/O wait states
>
> and how often does something wait for io and how often does some data is
> purged from the cache, because the other make instance is activated?

The best way to find out is to test in your own circumstances.

> When I switched from j2 to j1, compiling did not take any longer - but
> the box way much more usable.

Whereas when I changed from j3 to j5 on my 2 CPUs, compiling seemed to take 
less time and I didn't notice any effect on responsiveness.

-- 
Rgds
Peter
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-06 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-05  8:45 [gentoo-amd64] Unexpected side effect of GCC 4 Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 10:12 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2006-11-05 11:50   ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 12:10     ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06  8:17       ` Duncan
2006-11-06  8:29         ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 15:57           ` Duncan
2006-11-06  7:50     ` Duncan
2006-11-06  8:48       ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 16:01         ` Duncan
2006-11-06 16:06         ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06  8:41     ` Duncan
2006-11-06 10:47       ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 11:48         ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 12:05           ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 12:49             ` Jack Lloyd
2006-11-06 12:59               ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 13:06                 ` Jack Lloyd
2006-11-06 15:06                 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2006-11-06 11:44       ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 15:51         ` Duncan
2006-11-08 11:19           ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-08 15:17             ` Duncan
2006-11-10 10:14               ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 13:24   ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-05 23:26     ` Duncan
2006-11-08 10:14 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Peter Humphrey
2006-11-08 11:06   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611061506.32157.prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
    --to=prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox