From: Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 15:06:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611061506.32157.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611061359.33291.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
On Monday 06 November 2006 12:59, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Monday 06 November 2006 13:49, Jack Lloyd wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 01:05:31PM +0100, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > > lets ask the other way round. Why should it speed up anything to have
> > > X>number of cores?
> >
> > To account for I/O wait states
>
> and how often does something wait for io and how often does some data is
> purged from the cache, because the other make instance is activated?
The best way to find out is to test in your own circumstances.
> When I switched from j2 to j1, compiling did not take any longer - but
> the box way much more usable.
Whereas when I changed from j3 to j5 on my 2 CPUs, compiling seemed to take
less time and I didn't notice any effect on responsiveness.
--
Rgds
Peter
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-06 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-05 8:45 [gentoo-amd64] Unexpected side effect of GCC 4 Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 10:12 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2006-11-05 11:50 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 12:10 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 8:17 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 8:29 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 15:57 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 7:50 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 8:48 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 16:01 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 16:06 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 8:41 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 10:47 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 11:48 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 12:05 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 12:49 ` Jack Lloyd
2006-11-06 12:59 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 13:06 ` Jack Lloyd
2006-11-06 15:06 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2006-11-06 11:44 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 15:51 ` Duncan
2006-11-08 11:19 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-08 15:17 ` Duncan
2006-11-10 10:14 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 13:24 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-05 23:26 ` Duncan
2006-11-08 10:14 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Peter Humphrey
2006-11-08 11:06 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611061506.32157.prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
--to=prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox