From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ggztq-0001Pt-Hk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 08:32:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA68TsIn016582; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:29:54 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.21]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA68TrWE024821 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:29:53 GMT Received: from poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BFC420365C for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by poseidon.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01962203652 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:29:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1) with ESMTPS id 17979679 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 09:29:52 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:29:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200611050845.42865.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <200611051210.25023.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611060929.52020.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: b78751ec-c059-4a6f-9cf8-d3a6bfcc0a0c X-Archives-Hash: 124edc07a734fe331d7704ea80fcab9f On Monday 06 November 2006 09:17, Duncan wrote: > > I mentioned that I need to do an emerge -emptytree again, as it has been > awhile. where is the logic with that? You don't need to do regularly --emptytree emerges. If you don't change gcc you never need it. So why? -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list