From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gh0C7-0004Rh-8g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 08:51:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA68n3AW008479; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:49:03 GMT Received: from smtp2.nildram.co.uk (smtp2.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA68n2G2031320 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:49:03 GMT Received: from wstn.prhnet (prh.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.251.123]) by smtp2.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FDE2B9CB5; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:48:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 08:48:16 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200611050845.42865.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <200611051150.06468.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611060848.16269.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> X-Archives-Salt: 0102db88-3f60-4b2a-9ea5-a1b96d8728e9 X-Archives-Hash: b261117381719c052ef9f3cb547a3135 On Monday 06 November 2006 07:50, Duncan wrote: > What version of gentoolkit do you have? qpkg is deprecated and has been > since at at least gentoolkit 0.2.2-rc1, merged here back on May 27, > according to my logs. It's gentoolkit-0.2.3_pre2. I know it's deprecated, but that was done far too early, as at the time equery couldn't do half the things qpkg did. Definitely a case of too much haste. > Even if you are using an older version, consider switching to equery > instead, as qpkg hasn't been under development for some time and may > therefore have strange bugs. I do use equery more now, and sooner or later will probably drop qpkg quietly. I'm certainly not complaining of bugs in it. > I'd say this is probably one example, tho it's still working sort of > correctly for you. Quite so. -- Rgds Peter -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list