From: Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Unexpected side effect of GCC 4
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:10:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611051210.25023.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611051150.06468.prh@gotadsl.co.uk>
On Sunday 05 November 2006 11:50, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 05 November 2006 10:12, Duncan wrote:
> > What about linux-headers and glibc? The new glibc (2.5) has had some
> > very strange interactions here.
>
> Good point. On the firewall I have:
> $ qpkg -v -I glibc
> sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r3
> $ qpkg -v -I linux-headers
> sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.6.17-r1
> $ uname -r
> 2.6.17-gentoo-r8
> $ gcc-config -l
> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 *
> [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
> [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
> [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
> [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednossp
> [6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1
>
> and on the workstation I have:
> $ qpkg -v -I glibc
> /glibc-2.5
> $ qpkg -v -I linux-headers
> /linux-headers-2.6.17-r1
> $ uname -r
> 2.6.18-gentoo-r1
> $ gcc-config -l
> [1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1 *
> (I don't know what's causing qpkg to drop the first part of the package
> name on the workstation. Is this another pointer to glibc?)
[...]
> The firewall box has been untouched and continues to run with
> glibc-2.4-r3 and linux-headers-2.16.7-r1; that's the box with the rsync
> server. The workstation is the one with all the changes, being in fact a
> new installation from scratch. If I boot the old system, which I think
> has the same versions of glibc and linux-headers as the firewall box
> (I'll try that in a minute and let you know if it's otherwise),
In fact the old workstation system is like this (I'm running it now):
$ qpkg -v -I glibc
/glibc-2.5
$ qpkg -v -I linux-headers
/linux-headers-2.6.17-r1
prh@wstn ~ $ uname -r
2.6.18-gentoo-r1
prh@wstn ~ $ gcc-config -l
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 *
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened
[3] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie
[4] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp
[5] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednossp
[6] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1
$ emerge --info | grep FLAGS
CFLAGS="-march=k8 -Os -pipe -frename-registers -fweb -freorder-blocks -freorder-blocks-and-partition -funit-at-a-time -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants"
CXXFLAGS="-march=k8 -Os -pipe -frename-registers -fweb -freorder-blocks -funit-at-a-time -fgcse-sm -fgcse-las -fgcse-after-reload -fmerge-all-constants"
Unset: CTARGET, INSTALL_MASK, LDFLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
(Note the partial package name reported by qpkg.)
So I have a pointer away from glibc and linux-headers. CFLAGS on the new
system are as on the old but with -combine added.The old and new systems
have the same versions of kernel, linux-headers and glibc, but different
versions of gcc. Rsync is crippled on the old system but fine on the new
one.
--
Rgds
Peter
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-05 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-05 8:45 [gentoo-amd64] Unexpected side effect of GCC 4 Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 10:12 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2006-11-05 11:50 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 12:10 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2006-11-06 8:17 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 8:29 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 15:57 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 7:50 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 8:48 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 16:01 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 16:06 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 8:41 ` Duncan
2006-11-06 10:47 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 11:48 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 12:05 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 12:49 ` Jack Lloyd
2006-11-06 12:59 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-06 13:06 ` Jack Lloyd
2006-11-06 15:06 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 11:44 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-06 15:51 ` Duncan
2006-11-08 11:19 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-08 15:17 ` Duncan
2006-11-10 10:14 ` Peter Humphrey
2006-11-05 13:24 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2006-11-05 23:26 ` Duncan
2006-11-08 10:14 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Peter Humphrey
2006-11-08 11:06 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611051210.25023.prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
--to=prh@gotadsl.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox