From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GfKMN-00017k-Fv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:58:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA1Hs0G5001047; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:54:00 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA1Hrxo4009766 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:54:00 GMT Received: from hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EBDB1F55C3 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:53:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (poseidon [139.174.2.21]) by hades.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7215E1F5598 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:53:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.1) with ESMTPS id 17892398 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:53:59 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] 2.6.18 kernel Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:53:58 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <4548D810.3010103@ercbroadband.org> In-Reply-To: <4548D810.3010103@ercbroadband.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611011853.58787.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 075d5d0e-78ca-4dd7-82b4-004ace1b276d X-Archives-Hash: 39a739f59e3238969085ac5368d0b1de On Wednesday 01 November 2006 18:23, Mark Haney wrote: > Is it just me or is the .18 kernel slow in getting unmasked? I don't > recall any other releases taking as long to be marked stable, but then I > haven't been quite as anxious to test a new kernel as I have been for > .18. I'm sure people are running it, so I ask, how is it? Has it been > stable or is it not quite ready for us 'less than hardcore' testers? > it 'works for me'. That does not say much, because other people might use their box different, less typing than me, more downloading or stuff enconding... but so far, 2.6.18 behaved civilised. No problems. Again, for me - other people might have survived the occasional horror story. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list