From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GedI8-00039N-GB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:59:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9UJtLep028544; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:55:21 GMT Received: from aa011msr.fastwebnet.it (aa011msr.fastwebnet.it [85.18.95.71]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9UJtK0c003644 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:55:20 GMT Received: from [1.36.68.34] (1.36.68.34) by aa011msr.fastwebnet.it (7.3.105.6) id 452E069900BC52BB for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:52:33 +0100 From: Francesco Talamona To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gcc 4.1.1 access violation Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:52:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <7c8072a00610271620o15838e70of02ad445af47849d@mail.gmail.com> <200610301957.43318.ti.liame@email.it> <200610302019.28862.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <200610302019.28862.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610302052.32944.ti.liame@email.it> X-Archives-Salt: 03c99aa1-46d0-45c3-9436-06352f01e631 X-Archives-Hash: 6552a83f3ed3448de91cd9242d13e600 On Monday 30 October 2006 20:19, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > you have experienced it. You just don't see it. Somewhere in your > filesystem are files, that should not be there. Files, that portage > does not know about and that won't be removed, when the package gets > uninstalled. I ran findcruft some months ago, and it found some cruft around, but nothing really dangerous. Of course was impossible to track back every mud spot... > If a package does not build with sandbox, it is broken. Open a bug. Anyway, I just followed your advice and unset "-sandbox" fom my FEATURES. I really don't need it (anymore). If anything tries to escape its sandbox should be considered potentially dangerous, lesson learned. Thanks Francesco -- Linux Version 2.6.18-gentoo-r1, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Oct 18 22:52:55 CEST 2006 One 1.8GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 3607.13 Bogomips Total aemaeth -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list