From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GZSUd-00007I-Da for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:26:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9GDNQlY025188; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:23:26 GMT Received: from ender.volumehost.net (adsl-69-154-123-202.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9GDNPnh022905 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:23:25 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4A9D69B for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:23:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at volumehost.net Received: from ender.volumehost.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ender.volumehost.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZIqJwdJnumCO for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net (adsl-69-154-123-205.dsl.fyvlar.swbell.net [69.154.123.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ender.volumehost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AE425B5 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:23:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:23:40 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <45336D3E.4080009@gentoo.org> <29c147bd0610160603g34a34cd7q3a7a9e0731eb9130@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <29c147bd0610160603g34a34cd7q3a7a9e0731eb9130@mail.gmail.com> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6005049.M4SoEzAKoB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200610160823.40596.bss03@volumehost.net> X-Archives-Salt: 57711d74-d8f2-46b6-9f5f-f3a9d83a2cb2 X-Archives-Hash: 2018faee7fba86603fb0e236522e210e --nextPart6005049.M4SoEzAKoB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 16 October 2006 08:03, "Lorenzo Milesi"=20 wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org=20 natively available for AMD64': > > It finally happened: openoffice is expected to compile and work > > natively on amd64. > I had seen it this morning, and I though "What?!" :) > Which are the real advantages in compiling OOo instead of using -bin? Well, it certainly looks and feels different when compiled with the kde=20 useflag, or at least did on my x86 laptop. Also, the version I compiled on my memory-starved 2.4GHz P4 laptop started= =20 5-10 times faster then the binary version installed on my 2.2GHz 4GB RAM=20 2x Dual-core Opteron monster. OOo-bin sucked so much on AMD64 (for me, it's subjective) that I loved it=20 when KOffice finally became usable for me. =2D-=20 "If there's one thing we've established over the years, it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest clue what's best for them in terms of package stability." =2D- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh --nextPart6005049.M4SoEzAKoB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFM4fcq72nDbhDXToRAofUAJ4rlCd6EICT/03/5M9/Kt7qPztNEwCfcMVw NKmOEBE/MLS8dmT2LBdRyGw= =bTq5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6005049.M4SoEzAKoB-- -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list