Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64

["Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@volumehost.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]

On Monday 16 October 2006 08:03, "Lorenzo Milesi" 
<lorenzo.milesi@gmail.com> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org 
natively available for AMD64':
> > It finally happened: openoffice is expected to compile and work
> > natively on amd64.
> I had seen it this morning, and I though "What?!" :)
> Which are the real advantages in compiling OOo instead of using -bin?

Well, it certainly looks and feels different when compiled with the kde 
useflag, or at least did on my x86 laptop.

Also, the version I compiled on my memory-starved 2.4GHz P4 laptop started 
5-10 times faster then the binary version installed on my 2.2GHz 4GB RAM 
2x Dual-core Opteron monster.

OOo-bin sucked so much on AMD64 (for me, it's subjective) that I loved it 
when KOffice finally became usable for me.

-- 
"If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability."
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]