Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?

[Sergio Polini <sp_rm_it@yahoo.it>]

Mark Knecht:
> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
> drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK)

Great! ;-)

I've lost DRI when I've switched to modular X.
I see in Xorg.0.log:

drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: Open failed
...
(EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed to open the DRM
[dri] Disabling DRI.

Please, could you tell me:
i) kernel version;
ii) the relevant settings in your kernel .config, for instance:
  CONFIG_MTRR
  CONFIG_AGP
  CONFIG_AGP_AMD64
  CONFIG_AGP_INTEL
  CONFIG_DRM
iii) mesa version;
iv) have you emerged x11-drm?
v) your "Device" section in xorg.conf;
vi) whatever info you think could help me ;-)

Thanks
Sergio


>
> I do NOT do ANY Linux-based 3D stuff today. My workload is Mainly
> music applications - Ardour, etc., which do not care about 3D, web
> browsing, MythTV and Xine to watch movies.  Do I / should I care
> about DRI?
>
> I do occasionally play Windows games under Cedega. Would DRI ever
> help that sort of application?
>
> Anyway, things seem to be in pretty good shape. Maybe I should just
> leave good enough alone. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> P.S. - I'm still curious about trying your compiler flags but now
> there is no pressing timeframe to do it in on this machine. - MWK
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list