From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FE8BW-0008WI-Q8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:58:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SGpccF000697; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:51:38 GMT Received: from gaia.prhnet (prh.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.251.123]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SGpajG014829 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:51:37 GMT Received: (qmail 11107 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2006 16:52:33 +0000 Received: from wstn.home (192.168.129.25) by gaia.prhnet with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Feb 2006 16:52:33 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey Organization: Computing Essence To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: xinerama in xorg-x11-7.0-r1? Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:52:20 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200602272332.12370.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <200602280915.09978.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602281652.20678.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> X-Archives-Salt: 2685b667-abcd-430d-acd8-d8f2931d5ee6 X-Archives-Hash: 7c3cbd06563e612f3bb2b49e842fb168 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 14:01, Duncan wrote: > I'd still be inclined to consider it an issue with the new modular X. > Not all is yet entirely smooth going with it. Ok. > Also note that Section ServerFlags of xorg.conf can contain an Option > "Xinerama" line. Previously, even if Xinerama support was compiled, it > was off by default unless you had that option listed and it wasn't > toggled off in the option (the option defaults to on if found, so on > doesn't have to be specified). Assuming you don't have that option > listed, perhaps the default has changed, and it now defaults to on under > certain circumstances? Perhaps, but it seems odd that the feature has been compiled in at all. And no, I have no such line in /etc/X11/xorg.conf. > I'd check and see if there's a bug on it, and consider filing one, if > not. Ok. Done. -- Rgds Peter -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list