From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcT2X-0006KB-56 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:33:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGJWBeN010736; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:32:11 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAGJWA6b009691 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:32:11 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C96FB2A6D4B for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:32:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934D12A6C99 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:32:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTP id 9237206 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:32:10 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Anyone else running the KDE 3.5-rc1? Trouble with kmail? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:32:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <200511161606.07866.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511162032.10112.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jAGJWA6b009691 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id jAGJWBfQ010736 X-Archives-Salt: 5200ad01-3103-4df9-bf10-9cb13a065be0 X-Archives-Hash: c086daebfe4f67e547361af87133d97d On Wednesday 16 November 2005 18:30, Duncan wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin posted > <200511161606.07866.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>, excerpted > > below, on Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:06:07 +0100: > > Hi, > > I am using 3.5-rc1 and had not one crash so far. Not one KDE app cras= hed. > > > > I am using Kmail pretty much, with 100+/- some douzend emails a day a= nd > > it just works. > > > > I have glibc2.3.6, but I am using gcc 3.4.4 > > > > So I would suspect some miscompilation by gcc4 ... there are some > > reasons, that it is still hardmasked ;) > > Yes, but usually it's simply that it's stricter and therefore refuses t= o > compile whatever. Additionally, KDE 3.5 is supposed to be gcc-4.x test= ed > upstream, as they are doing the gcc-4.x fvisibility stuff that had to b= e > pulled from kde 3.4.whatever. hm, very intersting, but the gcc is the only difference. Hm, or is it th= e=20 binutils? I have=20 sys-devel/binutils Latest version available: 2.16.1 Latest version installed: 2.16.1 > > Never-the-less, thanks for the datapoint! It could well be that this > isn't one of those "usually" things. =3D8^\ Now that I know it works = for > you with glibc-2.3.6, and gcc-3.4.x, I can eselect compiler to 3.4.4 an= d > recompile, to see if that fixes it. If I can trace it, perhaps filling= a > bug upstream may be appropriate. > > Everything else seems to be working great, including one thing I had a > problem with in beta2! =3D8^) > hm, for me, kde 3.5-beta2 and rc1 are even more stable than any other rel= ease=20 ever. I had not one crash or misbehaviour so far - which is very promising.=20 But if you want to recompile with ggcc3.4 don't you need to recompile qt = and=20 kdelibs too? I am not sure, but prior experiences with 3.2 and 3.3 told me, that=20 kdepackages can be pretty annoying if not compiled with the exact same=20 compiler. Gl=FCck Auf Volker --=20 gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list