From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EcOuk-0000a3-2L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:09:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAGF69DD005635; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:06:09 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAGF687N003335 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:06:09 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C573B2A9E91 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:06:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00A12A9C15 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:06:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTP id 9229936 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:06:08 +0100 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Anyone else running the KDE 3.5-rc1? Trouble with kmail? Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:06:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511161606.07866.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 4009f05f-c9be-4caf-9c0e-6c0dee4e5a22 X-Archives-Hash: 8210a3da88ae770b98be367172ea06de Hi, I am using 3.5-rc1 and had not one crash so far. Not one KDE app crashed. I am using Kmail pretty much, with 100+/- some douzend emails a day and it just works. I have glibc2.3.6, but I am using gcc 3.4.4 So I would suspect some miscompilation by gcc4 ... there are some reasons, that it is still hardmasked ;) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list