Re: [gentoo-amd64] openoffice 2 compiles?

[Barry.SCHWARTZ@chemoelectric.org]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 937 bytes --]

Hanno Meyer-Thurow <h.mth@web.de> skribis:
> Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@getdesigned.at> wrote:
> > Well, I disagree that the code needs a full rewrite. Why? All it needs 
> > is correcting all places where it attempts to store pointers in 32-bit 
> > variables....
>
> I am no programmer and what you say sure is correct but of what i listened
> from some OOo devs is that some parts (big or small) need rewrite to
> get stable on amd64.

I speak programmer. This is jargon meaning the code is so complicated
and/or so poorly understood that it might be easier, faster, more
reliable, better in the long run, and more personally rewarding to
rewrite.  :)

-- 
Barry.SCHWARTZ@chemoelectric.org   http://www.chemoelectric.org
Esperantistoj rajtas skribi al Barijo.SXVARCO@chemoelectric.org
   'And now we're going to go try to comfort people in that
 part of the world.' -- Bush, referring to the southeastern U.S.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]