From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELoIB-0006El-RD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 20:49:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j91Ke55Z003333; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 20:40:05 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j91Ke5mt024436 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 20:40:05 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 015122A8FF0 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:47:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF86C2A8FB3 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8) with ESMTP id 8158605 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:47:52 +0200 From: "Hemmann, Volker Armin" To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] oom killer problems - solved Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:47:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200509282235.32195.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> In-Reply-To: <200509282235.32195.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510012247.52278.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 60d70275-dfb9-4483-b0b6-d142984a10a5 X-Archives-Hash: e6d43a06ebb48f57b82aff76d6193e99 Hi, I tried vanilla kernel org kernel (2.6.14-rc2) and no oom-kills occur! Hmm, does that mean, that there is a bug in the gentoo-sources? -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list