From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJtDV-00050A-An for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:40:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8QDW9xa014319; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:32:09 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.12]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8QDW9VZ025892 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:32:09 GMT Received: from amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F6B627E05C for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:39:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tu-clausthal.de (hathor.rz.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.2.1]) by amun.rz.tu-clausthal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F365127E050 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:39:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from energy.heim10.tu-clausthal.de ([139.174.241.94] verified) by tu-clausthal.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 7975573 for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:39:00 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: sempron make options Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:39:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1127513537.21021.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1127741089.7311.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1127741089.7311.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509261539.00539.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Virus-Scanned: by PureMessage V4.7 at tu-clausthal.de X-Archives-Salt: 89d4217c-91b0-4961-88e4-33f4ef6091c0 X-Archives-Hash: 62e122862217270967c65e5933df6ee5 On Monday 26 September 2005 15:24, Alvin Thompson wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 05:13 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > To date (thru 4.0.1), gcc treats all the amd64 family the same -- they > > are all aliased to each other, so to with them, it doesn't matter. > > so i should use the x86 version of gentoo with amd64 make flags? does > that mean i need to somehow use gcc 4.0.1 when bootstrapping? > the only way to make sure: open your case, remove the cooler, write down the OPN and go to amd's quick reference site. btw, when you read anandtech you'll see, that gcc4 makes slower code for amd64 than gcc 3.4 -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list