From: Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@ifa.hawaii.edu>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Upgrading to Raid
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 00:02:24 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050902100224.GA31184@ifa.hawaii.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43169348.1060109@albrookdata.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3298 bytes --]
I have a large number (more then a dozen) 3Ware 8500 and 9500 cards.
The majority of these are 12-port SATA cards with RAID 5 volumes on
them.
Three quick observations:
* Software RAID 5 on Linux WILL NOT remap bad blocks/sectors like a
hardware RAID controller. If you care about your data, software RAID
simply isn't an option.
* The RAID 5 performance of 3Ware controllers is terrible. The 9500
series cards can push 50-55MB/s with xfs and in the neighborhood of
45MB/s with ext3 (with an enlarged journal, etc.) for sequential writes,
random I/O is even worse. The 8500 cards are about 10% slower compared
to the 9500 once you fill up the on-card cache.
* Neither xfs or ext3 are reliable on volumes greater then 2TB. Nor can
fdisk even partition them (but lvm2 can handle them).
Cheers,
-J
--
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:36:08AM -0500, Francisco Perez wrote:
> Scott,
> I have a 3Ware Escalade 4 chaneel hardware raid controller running raid
> 10. Here are my thoughts: The card itself was $175.00 and the 4 250GB
> brives were $150 bucks a piece, so the cost is considerable. If you are
> only going to have two disks mirrored, you can get the two channel card
> and two drives and mirror them which is obviously less money. My system
> is a Tyan Transport GX-28 with 2 Opteron 246's and originally I had the
> drives on the onboard controller. First, there is a very noticable
> increase in performance going from the integrated (software) raid
> controller to the hardware raid controller. For my percieved needs it
> was definitely worth the money. Second, its a nice reassurance to know
> that if a drive (or even two drives) fails the hardware controller can
> restore the array by popping in a new disk without me having to do
> much...I'm not sure if this is the case with the integrated or linux
> raid. With the hardware controller, if I wanted a bit more storage
> space, I could have chosen to make a raid five array, something that as
> far as I know is unavailable in both integrated and Linux array (at
> least now without a significant performance hit.) Hope that helps.
>
> Frank
>
> scotthathcock@comcast.net wrote:
> >I currently have an ASUS K8V Deluxe system with an 80GB SATA drive. It
> >used to have a old 10GB PATA disk for M$ dual boot. That disk died and
> >was interfering with boot, so it's in the trash.
> >
> >The dead disk reminded me of the pain I will suffer if I loose my linux
> >system. Even with backups of my home dir, which I'm not as good about as
> >I should be, a full fresh install would be a pain. Thus, I am
> >considering Raid.
> >
> >Does anyone have experience with RAID on this Board?
> >Is the Via or Promise controller better for this?
> >Is there a good Howto on migrating from a non Raid disk to Raid? I
> >recall seeing one but can't find it now.
> >Am I wasting time and money? Should I just do a better job of backup? Is
> >there a resource on what to backup to allow a fast regeneration (or
> >duplication) of an existing gentoo system?
> >
> >Finally, thanks for the great distribution. I use a commercial distro at
> >work and I am much happier with Gentoo. :)
> >
> >Scott
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-02 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-01 3:46 [gentoo-amd64] Upgrading to Raid scotthathcock
2005-09-01 3:59 ` Nuitari
2005-09-01 4:18 ` Chris S
2005-09-01 4:34 ` Chris S
2005-09-01 14:54 ` Billy Holmes
2005-09-01 5:29 ` Kyle Liddell
2005-09-01 5:36 ` Francisco Perez
2005-09-02 10:02 ` Joshua Hoblitt [this message]
2005-09-02 13:22 ` Matt Randolph
2005-09-02 19:56 ` Joshua Hoblitt
2005-09-03 9:54 ` Florian D.
2005-09-03 20:45 ` Homer Parker
2005-09-04 17:16 ` Florian D.
2005-09-03 0:04 ` Florian D.
2005-09-03 1:24 ` Francisco Perez
2005-09-03 3:18 ` Nuitari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050902100224.GA31184@ifa.hawaii.edu \
--to=jhoblitt@ifa.hawaii.edu \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox