From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QeWWJ-0000N5-OZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:08:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51F2921C151 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBBF21C029 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so391256bwg.40 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:41:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=unqZvyYxB6BJX/KhW5kKyabNnHxL932RsOmb+Ry/ayw=; b=XzVlWf8rORfA789u3tMd7XgtXT4yXskiEFHbhOx8+NGpAsyclUp8iXcaovIy96kcLC SnkkM/EoZoRMx6/9nVyrznwjaMXzUmbNnL0bTrVLX5TBuqEPlVEh3ad4o+QFXvL7eCEP 2AutZ1sSTwFwv7IG7MNF/fo5TURw2bhq5u/lU= Received: by 10.204.232.73 with SMTP id jt9mr8050489bkb.214.1309974067686; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC742CF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.66.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c13sm7736485bkc.14.2011.07.06.10.41.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:41:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Glibc Update Breaks Open/LibreOffice -- Can't Downgrade Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:40:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1569579.6MFKAECpi5@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39.2; KDE/4.6.90; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20110706120845.6f111797.frank.peters@comcast.net> References: <20110705213148.ca51f2ac.frank.peters@comcast.net> <20110706120845.6f111797.frank.peters@comcast.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 698fd9276a6f5195f8fefc145cae1754 On Wednesday 06 July 2011 12:08:45 Frank Peters wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:22:33 -0500 > Paul Hartman wrote: > > Take a look at this page:> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Downgrade_Glibc> > > And also this forum topic:> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-845000- start-0.html > Thanks for these links. > What a mess! In my case there would be no problem becauseabsolutely nothing was built against the new glibc. > However, I found another solution. I did not realize thatGentoo offers a binary OpenOffice package. Installingthis openoffice-bin package now gives me an OpenOfficethat starts with the new glibc update. > So the new question is why does the binary from OO/LOfail to start while the Gentoo binary shows no problem?AFAIK they are the same package, but the directory structuresare different. > Anyway, I'm glad to have OO running. > Frank Peters one is compiled by the ooo guys for some setup they consider 'standard'. The other compiled against gentoo stable tree. Huge differences. Really. -- #163933