public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Glibc Update Breaks Open/LibreOffice -- Can't Downgrade
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:40:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1569579.6MFKAECpi5@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110706120845.6f111797.frank.peters@comcast.net>

On Wednesday 06 July 2011 12:08:45 Frank Peters wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:22:33 -0500
> Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Take a look at this page:> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Downgrade_Glibc> 
> > And also this forum topic:> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-845000-
start-0.html
> Thanks for these links.
> What a mess!  In my case there would be no problem becauseabsolutely nothing 
was built against the new glibc.
> However, I found another solution.  I did not realize thatGentoo offers a 
binary OpenOffice package.  Installingthis openoffice-bin package now gives me 
an OpenOfficethat starts with the new glibc update.
> So the new question is why does the binary from OO/LOfail to start while the 
Gentoo binary shows no problem?AFAIK they are the same package, but the 
directory structuresare different.
> Anyway, I'm glad to have OO running.
> Frank Peters

one is compiled by the ooo guys for some setup they consider 'standard'. The 
other compiled against gentoo stable tree.

Huge differences. Really.


-- 
#163933



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-06 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-06  1:31 [gentoo-amd64] Glibc Update Breaks Open/LibreOffice -- Can't Downgrade Frank Peters
2011-07-06  2:28 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-07-06  3:11   ` Frank Peters
2011-07-06  5:22     ` Paul Hartman
2011-07-06 16:08       ` Frank Peters
2011-07-06 17:26         ` Barry Schwartz
2011-07-06 17:40         ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2011-07-06 18:57           ` Frank Peters
2011-07-06 22:20     ` Benny Pedersen
2011-07-08 21:06     ` James Cloos
2011-07-06  3:10 ` Barry Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1569579.6MFKAECpi5@localhost \
    --to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox