From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Qav4I-0005uF-JG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:32:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 373191C06B; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FD91C06B for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so4967963bwg.40 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:31:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=FFG3eFgMNQy9wyYBD9lC2n6wazT3kqCYM3DEaXcg5s4=; b=P1FRaLyhIvLAK9xZncSeuGfKV/b08CryHK31Srp2odIF9ZD0LUHHLzjR4LQAc8Nlhs MrWuS+pzHj+k1cxfzhHLSxarkjirWshG6N3E5mA4lOlicZnmO6GBUTcLyyJUHEUpOSr+ +y30WR3kQBt5vgi1aRifOz6ivs6kR5vUw+GaI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=T/5jwvydEEbIVNpIEfN9bUzRRuQKBnDDxAwu9NYNAINjuMtlEi1ewY/DaAjjX7d4hp oCklh5qqFlPvIbooS8BWoPySOUzWcImpod5rqJ8UHn2CRK63zZmPv73Yidb7FeTkksmD lrjNQM5C6qNy95pQvemRegG/WbSy/801+A254= Received: by 10.204.14.12 with SMTP id e12mr3476290bka.210.1309116675246; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC75E32.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.94.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c13sm30915bkc.2.2011.06.26.12.31.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:31:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:31:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1309119424.txH9QVNGPR@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39.2; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20110626192111.GA23315@crud> References: <20110625134111.5c6b08dd.frank.peters@comcast.net> <2323879.K7oNoNLrZF@localhost> <20110626192111.GA23315@crud> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 8c06bff7de31773dad668d2a406550e0 On Sunday 26 June 2011 14:21:11 Barry Schwartz wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann skribis: > > ok, I tried ekopath: > > > > UCBFAIL indicates problems! > > /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for > > generic /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line > > 444 for generic /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild > > at line 701 for double /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in > > coshd at line 701 for double /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest > > UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double > > /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests > > completed > > /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for > > generic > > > > only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS! > > That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and > quality" no, that probably means that the 'problem' is either not a problem at all. Failing some test and not being accurate or being wrong or even not following some standard are very different thins or not caused by the compilers but something else. Like libc, libm, etc. -- #163933