From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:31:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309119424.txH9QVNGPR@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110626192111.GA23315@crud>
On Sunday 26 June 2011 14:21:11 Barry Schwartz wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> skribis:
> > ok, I tried ekopath:
> >
> > UCBFAIL indicates problems!
> > /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for
> > generic /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line
> > 444 for generic /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild
> > at line 701 for double /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in
> > coshd at line 701 for double /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest
> > UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double
> > /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests
> > completed
> > /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for
> > generic
> >
> > only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS!
>
> That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and
> quality"
no, that probably means that the 'problem' is
either not a problem at all. Failing some test and not being accurate or being
wrong or even not following some standard are very different thins
or not caused by the compilers but something else. Like libc, libm, etc.
--
#163933
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-26 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-25 17:41 [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Frank Peters
2011-06-25 23:54 ` Marc Joliet
2011-06-26 0:22 ` Mark Knecht
2011-06-26 1:10 ` Frank Peters
2011-06-26 1:28 ` Frank Peters
2011-06-26 3:44 ` [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification [Solved] Frank Peters
2011-06-26 3:54 ` Mark Knecht
2011-06-26 4:39 ` Frank Peters
2011-06-26 11:33 ` James Cloos
2011-06-26 12:57 ` Mark Knecht
2011-06-26 16:30 ` Barry Schwartz
2011-06-26 11:30 ` [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-06-26 12:13 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-06-26 13:17 ` [gentoo-amd64] unsubscribe Piotr Hosowicz
2011-06-26 15:40 ` Dale
2011-06-26 17:26 ` Lie Ryan
2011-06-26 17:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-06-26 17:52 ` Dale
2011-06-27 3:22 ` [gentoo-amd64] unsubscribe Duncan
2011-06-26 17:43 ` [gentoo-amd64] unsubscribe Dale
2011-06-26 16:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] Possible Math Problem - Request For Verification Frank Peters
2011-06-26 17:04 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-06-26 17:17 ` Mark Knecht
2011-06-26 17:36 ` Frank Peters
2011-06-26 17:45 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-06-26 17:54 ` Barry Schwartz
2011-06-26 19:01 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-06-26 19:21 ` Barry Schwartz
2011-06-26 19:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2011-06-26 19:49 ` Mark Knecht
2011-06-26 20:33 ` Frank Peters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309119424.txH9QVNGPR@localhost \
--to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox