From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKhks-0006cM-6r for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:19:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 584E1E0526; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from csmtpout1.frontal.correo (outmailhost.terra.es [213.4.149.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054D8E0526 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.241] (81.47.145.63) by csmtpout1.frontal.correo (7.3.105.2) (authenticated as agtdino.teleline.es) id 479F7136000EEEFF for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:24:04 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] madwifi-ng not compile in amd64 From: agtdino To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <1201555535.24379.1.camel@gentoo> <1201645850.7098.8.camel@gentoo> <200801300220.21430.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:19:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1201817970.9013.4.camel@gentoo> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c8f3c13f-f640-401e-89b2-bbcf45b8da14 X-Archives-Hash: e077de9081b33e8af1bb53f22b4c70e0 After a few days I have now the system in a stable branch, and my profile is now apoint to the correct 2007.0 :-)=20 Now I'm more stable (xD) than when I decide to deinstall debian-amd64 and install gentoo-amd64. In two, I probe testing or unnestable packages, because there was the only ( in there moment ) way to probe this architecture.=20 Thank's for the tip, regard's=20 El mi=C3=A9, 30-01-2008 a las 09:18 +0100, Beso escribi=C3=B3: >=20 >=20 > 2008/1/30, Volker Armin Hemmann > : > On Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008, Beso wrote: > > the real problem stands in the keyword.... the amd64 would > downgrade a lot > > of stuff.... before doing it it's better to identify the > normal programs, > > like kde, gnome, and similar and let them be for the moment > as ~amd64.... > > but at least stuff like, gcc, glibc, baselayout, kernel and > some other base > > stuff should stay on the amd64 branch.... you won't be able > to downgrade > > glibc so that one for the moment would stay on the unstable > branch.... but > > if you don't feel in the mood to downgrade cause the ~amd64 > being to > > amd64, then just update the profile and you should see > something like 100 > > packages.... > > also adding --as-needed as LDFLAGS should help you save some > time in > > recompiling stuff.... > =20 > yeah - no. Don't do it. It breaks stuff. >=20 > it doesn't anymore. it works very well. > =20 >=20 > > the 2gb of ccache would help, but not a lot.... 400+ > packages would mean > > about 3-4 days on a amd64 2ghz single core, so prepare for a > looong time of > > compile time.... also the 5 blockers are not good and should > be fixed in > > some way before proceeding to the recompile.... > =20 > no, it would mean something around 12h. Depending on the > packages. >=20 > 400 packages of which gcc and gnome ones is more than 12h.... >=20 >=20 > > if you decide to modify the use flags when changing profile > it's the best > > time.... > =20 > yeah, check which flags changed, and which ones you really > need. That way you > might be able to cut down the amount of packages. > =20 > > so my advice is the following: > > 1. take some time to look at the use flags (emerge ufed and > see a > > description of them and also add/remove them from the ufed > gui in > > make.conf) > > 2. add LDFLAGS=3D"--as-needed" into make.conf > =20 > really, don't do it. >=20 > really do it!!!! the flag works very well and doesn't give any > breakage anymore.... the packages that are broken by this flags have > all ldflags removed in the ebuild so there's no reason to not use it.=20 >=20 >=20 > > > Total: 478 packages (1 upgrade, 396 downgrades, 14 new, 1 > in new slot, > > > 66 reinstalls, 5 blocks), Size of downloads: 480,074 kB > =20 > check your keywords - and blockers are easily solved. Usually > you need to > unmerge something. And the blocking ebuild tells you what. > =20 > =20 > And agtdino and Beso: > =20 > DO NOT TOP POST. > =20 > This is not a Windows mailing list. >=20 > this is how web gmail works when replying. >=20 >=20 > -- > gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > =20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > dott. ing. beso --=20 gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list