From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJlt5-0006f1-9Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:32:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20D15E04EC; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EC6E04EC for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.72] (ip72-213-148-73.ok.ok.cox.net [72.213.148.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417DF658EF for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] madwifi-ng not compile in amd64 From: Steev Klimaszewski To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1201594632.29366.6.camel@gentoo> References: <1201555535.24379.1.camel@gentoo> <200801282352.43451.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <1201594632.29366.6.camel@gentoo> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:31:42 -0600 Message-Id: <1201595503.27687.1.camel@kilik.ubersekret.info> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.21.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e6770124-5567-4b52-9ec3-797bd8500f89 X-Archives-Hash: 9b4268fef1bad1ad6445ec5e428381f2 On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote: > Hi, Hi! I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently incompatible (well there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper fix) with 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will need to compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a release (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two patches) that is compatible with 2.6.24. Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely necessary, I would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6 -- Steev -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list