From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gh7te-0006Vv-3m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:04:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6H1KhE030531; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:01:20 GMT Received: from nemesis.fprintf.net (nemesis.fprintf.net [66.134.112.218]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6H1IqY004319 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:01:19 GMT Received: (qmail 16214 invoked by uid 210); 6 Nov 2006 12:01:17 -0500 Received: from 65.247.36.242 by nemesis (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.2/2009. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(65.247.36.242):SA:0(-4.1/5.0):. Processed in 0.468891 secs); 06 Nov 2006 17:01:17 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 Received: from aa-redwall1.nexthop.com (HELO ?10.68.253.118?) (dang@fprintf.net@65.247.36.242) by nemesis.fprintf.net with SMTP; 6 Nov 2006 12:01:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Gnupg doesn't build From: Daniel Gryniewicz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <454F6945.1090704@ercbroadband.org> References: <454F6945.1090704@ercbroadband.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-V3mQWT8BsNiG0BnUyOLd" Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:55:31 -0500 Message-Id: <1162832132.9356.4.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.9.1 X-Archives-Salt: 218b35b6-af91-45cf-957e-22eeae5dff91 X-Archives-Hash: ad740d79ca3fab5e292d6bf8a09a1a6d --=-V3mQWT8BsNiG0BnUyOLd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 11:56 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: > I've tried everything over the last couple of days to upgrade gnupg and=20 > I get the same thing: >=20 > octavian ~ # emerge -u gnupg > Calculating dependencies... done! > >>> Auto-cleaning packages... >=20 > >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. >=20 >=20 > * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. >=20 > And it never gets upgraded. Has anyone else seen this? >=20 That indicates that portage thinks you have the newest version already. Which version do you have? Which do you want? Is the newer version masked by either package.mask (/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask or /etc/portage/package.mask)? Is the newer version keyworded higher than you accept? Daniel --=-V3mQWT8BsNiG0BnUyOLd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFT2kDomPajV0RnrERAqAwAJ0fmfwRBIcVIKL33CKgWfsYsOtddQCfZK47 xuavqnZCcM4H5xIo9r00iKc= =xvlK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-V3mQWT8BsNiG0BnUyOLd-- -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list