From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ETOzM-000265-8L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:25:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9MJLCYl008098; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:21:12 GMT Received: from nemesis.fprintf.net (nemesis.fprintf.net [66.134.112.218]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9MJLAnr020657 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:21:11 GMT Received: (qmail 18859 invoked by uid 210); 22 Oct 2005 15:44:10 -0400 Received: from 192.168.0.8 by nemesis (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.8):SA:0(-5.9/6.0):. Processed in 0.482321 secs); 22 Oct 2005 19:44:10 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=6.0 Received: from athena.fprintf.net (dang@fprintf.net@192.168.0.8) by nemesis.fprintf.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 2005 15:44:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC From: Daniel Gryniewicz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <200510210600.j9L60A500666@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> <1129953387.8251.15.camel@localhost> <1129997996.13397.64.camel@athena.fprintf.net> <435A77A9.3090602@gentoo.org> <1130005008.13397.78.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:24:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1130009045.13397.80.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c501f84d-ef9e-4f79-a995-c1d3fb6aeadd X-Archives-Hash: 08b34ad75b6f97a4b1abf07967840943 On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 14:28 -0400, Nuitari wrote: > >> Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > >>> Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one > >>> point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and > >>> it still didn't work. > >> > >> At least as client it works great here, can't say about the server part, as I > >> use vino for that. > > > > Okay, I admit I only tried the server, because the client was on my x86 > > work box. > > Both the realvnc client and server work for me > Also the X11 module > and the listening client > I'm using realvnc fine. It's tightvnc that broke. Daniel -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list