From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ETNxc-00070T-3x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:19:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9MIDuLB003311; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:13:56 GMT Received: from nemesis.fprintf.net (nemesis.fprintf.net [66.134.112.218]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9MIDs7k018741 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:13:55 GMT Received: (qmail 18381 invoked by uid 210); 22 Oct 2005 14:36:52 -0400 Received: from 192.168.0.8 by nemesis (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.8):SA:0(-5.9/6.0):. Processed in 0.473592 secs); 22 Oct 2005 18:36:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=6.0 Received: from athena.fprintf.net (dang@fprintf.net@192.168.0.8) by nemesis.fprintf.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 2005 14:36:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC From: Daniel Gryniewicz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <435A77A9.3090602@gentoo.org> References: <200510210600.j9L60A500666@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> <1129953387.8251.15.camel@localhost> <1129997996.13397.64.camel@athena.fprintf.net> <435A77A9.3090602@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:16:48 -0400 Message-Id: <1130005008.13397.78.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e4f05297-8272-44b3-ace8-a9133ac3f0db X-Archives-Hash: dd4ddb69fa4c95c65acddd07b4c79f96 On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 19:32 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: > Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one > > point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and > > it still didn't work. > > At least as client it works great here, can't say about the server part, as I > use vino for that. Okay, I admit I only tried the server, because the client was on my x86 work box. Daniel -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list