From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ETM7d-00040F-1K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:21:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9MGH4MH019102; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:17:04 GMT Received: from nemesis.fprintf.net (nemesis.fprintf.net [66.134.112.218]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9MGH2ao005647 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:17:03 GMT Received: (qmail 17817 invoked by uid 210); 22 Oct 2005 12:39:59 -0400 Received: from 192.168.0.8 by nemesis (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.4. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.8):SA:0(-5.9/6.0):. Processed in 0.501754 secs); 22 Oct 2005 16:39:59 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=6.0 Received: from athena.fprintf.net (dang@fprintf.net@192.168.0.8) by nemesis.fprintf.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 2005 12:39:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC From: Daniel Gryniewicz To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1129953387.8251.15.camel@localhost> References: <200510210600.j9L60A500666@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> <1129953387.8251.15.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:19:56 -0400 Message-Id: <1129997996.13397.64.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 6aa140af-3350-4b46-8d95-3d54a6e7dc07 X-Archives-Hash: 377734ca74d73586c7208a91f6431caa On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 16:56 +1300, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 00:00 -0600, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: > > [ebuild R ] net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 +server 0 kB > > > You should use tightvnc (you can't have both to emerge -C vnc first) > it's server and client are much more advanced and support more features > than the realvnc reference implementation. > Except that it doesn't work on amd64. I set out to make it work at one point, and made thousands of changes just to make it 64-bit clean, and it still didn't work. Daniel -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list