From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ETAHU-00049N-5p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:42:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9M3d86Y013847; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:39:08 GMT Received: from dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz (loadbalancer2.orcon.net.nz [219.88.242.4]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9M3d5k1003375 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:39:07 GMT Received: from rincewind.aenertia.net (port-210-54-152-120.fastadsl.net.nz [210.54.152.120] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j9M3fs1n003570 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:55 +1300 Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] VNC From: Joel Wiramu Pauling To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200510210600.j9L60A500666@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> References: <200510210600.j9L60A500666@webmail.phys.ualberta.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:56:27 +1300 Message-Id: <1129953387.8251.15.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1146/Fri Oct 21 17:36:48 2005 on dbmail-mx4.orcon.co.nz X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Archives-Salt: d9b644f9-5182-4049-865f-fb60929d4abb X-Archives-Hash: 49477b01c3b8f03a42850eeabbe2af0d On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 00:00 -0600, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote: > [ebuild R ] net-misc/vnc-4.0-r1 +server 0 kB > You should use tightvnc (you can't have both to emerge -C vnc first) it's server and client are much more advanced and support more features than the realvnc reference implementation. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list