Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.

[Michael Edwards <zappi@herz--aus--gold.de>]

Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2005, 19:02 +0200 schrieb Raffaele BELARDI:
> Duncan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>Anyone have a clue why I'm getting half what everyone else gets? o.O
> >>>
> >>>What kind of cpu/ram/motherboard do you have ?
> >>
> >>RAM: 2875MB/1002MB (286%) used (I didn't see swapping during the test, tho)
> >>Motherboard: Asus K8V-SE
> >>CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (2202.876 MHz)
> > 
> > 
> > Perhaps it has something to do with the layout of your memory (and BIOS
> > configuration), single-channel vs. dual-channel memory access?
> 
> I was thinking the same, but moore on the CPU side: the Asus K8V
> supports only the 745pin Athon64, which has a single memory channel as
> opposed to the 900+ pin (I don't remember the exact number) Athlon64 FX,
> which includes dual memory channel.
> 
> raffaele
I have here a DFI ut NF3 250GB Board, and the Results are equal to the
others:

1324.712769 MBytes Vs. 2465.333008 MBytes

AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3000+ (745pins) and two 512GB sticks.

Maybe there is something wrong with the Bios settings?

Michael Edwards

-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list