* RE: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 18:28 ` Mark Knecht
@ 2007-02-06 18:41 ` David Pyke
2007-02-06 18:43 ` Dieter Ries
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: David Pyke @ 2007-02-06 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
I haven't personally tried it but there are a few threads on the forums that
say it's possible. It will likely be slower than fglrx but give it a shot.
This thread should give you pointers.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-533752-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc
-highlight-.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Knecht [mailto:markknecht@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 1:29 PM
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
Thanks David.
I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run NVidia. I
have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't run well, on
ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its lack of 3D
acceleration rule out beryl?
Thanks,
Mark
On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@researchdimensions.com> wrote:
> It runs fine on my system. I have an NVIDIA card and run it with
> AIGLX to avoid the black window bug.
>
> The only advantage is it looks pretty. There's no real benefit to using
it.
>
>
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 18:28 ` Mark Knecht
2007-02-06 18:41 ` David Pyke
@ 2007-02-06 18:43 ` Dieter Ries
2007-02-06 20:07 ` Gary E. Miller
2007-02-06 18:47 ` Stephan Lorsbach
2007-02-16 12:19 ` Tony Sperling
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dieter Ries @ 2007-02-06 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 715 bytes --]
Am Dienstag 06 Februar 2007 19:28 schrieb Mark Knecht:
> Thanks David.
>
> I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run
> NVidia. I have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't
> run well, on ATI?
It's just way easier if you have an NVIDIA Card. The ~amd64 Nvidia Drivers
bring the right features with them, so you don't need any changes in your X
System. With nvidia its just two lines in Xorg.conf and an "emerge beryl",
and it works.
> I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its
> lack of 3D acceleration rule out beryl?
I don't think this should be a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
--
Frank Castle is dead!
Call me 'The PUNISHER'!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 18:43 ` Dieter Ries
@ 2007-02-06 20:07 ` Gary E. Miller
2007-02-06 20:25 ` Gary E. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gary E. Miller @ 2007-02-06 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yo Dieter!
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Dieter Ries wrote:
> It's just way easier if you have an NVIDIA Card. The ~amd64 Nvidia Drivers
> bring the right features with them, so you don't need any changes in your X
> System. With nvidia its just two lines in Xorg.conf
Care to enlighten me on which two lines? I already use the amd64 Nvidia
drivers.
> and an "emerge beryl",
Not quite, to get beryl to build I had to add these to my
/etc/portage/package.keywords:
=x11-wm/beryl-0.1.4 ~amd64
=x11-wm/emerald-0.1.4 ~amd64
=x11-wm/beryl-core-0.1.4 : ~amd64
=x11-plugins/beryl-plugins-0.1.4 ~amd64
=x11-plugins/beryl-dbus-0.1.4 ~amd64
=x11-themes/emerald-themes-0.1.4 ~amd64
=x11-misc/beryl-manager-0.1.4 ~amd64
=x11-apps/xlsclients-1.0.1 ~amd64
=x11-misc/beryl-settings-0.1.4 ~amd64
RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave., Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFyN/08KZibdeR3qURAnw2AJ0Wv/mV6sURV6C7mKMrIQCiHFsBYwCgoH+y
xElQQdMVvH3Fg5bcFqLDwl8=
=Gv74
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 20:07 ` Gary E. Miller
@ 2007-02-06 20:25 ` Gary E. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Gary E. Miller @ 2007-02-06 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yo Dieter!
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> > It's just way easier if you have an NVIDIA Card. The ~amd64 Nvidia Drivers
> > bring the right features with them, so you don't need any changes in your X
> > System. With nvidia its just two lines in Xorg.conf
>
> Care to enlighten me on which two lines? I already use the amd64 Nvidia
> drivers.
Never mind. It is all here:
http://wiki.beryl-project.org/wiki/Install_Beryl_on_Gentoo
RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave., Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1(541)382-8588
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFyORJ8KZibdeR3qURAhUbAKCik2N3HxCD7OgvewwfupU59I65FgCgiBJQ
8cmY2iXZwgfXmYoklI1ic0Y=
=vRtO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 18:28 ` Mark Knecht
2007-02-06 18:41 ` David Pyke
2007-02-06 18:43 ` Dieter Ries
@ 2007-02-06 18:47 ` Stephan Lorsbach
2007-02-06 19:28 ` Cermelo Woodgett
2007-02-16 12:19 ` Tony Sperling
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Lorsbach @ 2007-02-06 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Hi,
I tried it, but it doesn't work for me.
So I using beryl with the closed-source ATI-driver and Xgl.
Take a look at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_XGL
Greets,
Stephan
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>:
> Thanks David.
>
> I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run
> NVidia. I have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't
> run well, on ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its
> lack of 3D acceleration rule out beryl?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@researchdimensions.com> wrote:
> > It runs fine on my system. I have an NVIDIA card and run it with AIGLX
> > to avoid the black window bug.
> >
> > The only advantage is it looks pretty. There's no real benefit to using
> > it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 18:47 ` Stephan Lorsbach
@ 2007-02-06 19:28 ` Cermelo Woodgett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Cermelo Woodgett @ 2007-02-06 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
I'm running Beryl on an ATI Radeon Xpress 200M. I installed with
Sabayon and with a little tweaking I got it running. Look on the
Sabayon forums for it.
On 2/6/07, Stephan Lorsbach <stephan@klm.ath.cx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried it, but it doesn't work for me.
> So I using beryl with the closed-source ATI-driver and Xgl.
> Take a look at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_XGL
>
> Greets,
> Stephan
>
> Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 schrieb "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>:
> > Thanks David.
> >
> > I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run
> > NVidia. I have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't
> > run well, on ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its
> > lack of 3D acceleration rule out beryl?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> >
> > On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@researchdimensions.com> wrote:
> > > It runs fine on my system. I have an NVIDIA card and run it with AIGLX
> > > to avoid the black window bug.
> > >
> > > The only advantage is it looks pretty. There's no real benefit to using
> > > it.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
2007-02-06 18:28 ` Mark Knecht
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-06 18:47 ` Stephan Lorsbach
@ 2007-02-16 12:19 ` Tony Sperling
3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Sperling @ 2007-02-16 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
There is a pretty large ATI community over at Sabayon
(http://www.sabayonlinux.org) most have given up on XGL there, it seems, and
moved over to AIGLX - I'm on nVidia myself, and for me it is mostly stable.
There's a Wiki and an active Forum with a useful Tutorial section, almost
all tech stuff ends up pointing back at Gentoo, so you shouldn't have to
expect any Paradigm Changes!
Tony. . .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:28 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] beryl on AMD64
> Thanks David.
>
> I notice that many/most folks who have talked about it seem to run
> NVidia. I have an ATI. Any reason you know why it won't run, or won't
> run well, on ATI? I'm using the ATI driver form the kernel. Does its
> lack of 3D acceleration rule out beryl?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
> On 2/6/07, David Pyke <dpyke@researchdimensions.com> wrote:
> > It runs fine on my system. I have an NVIDIA card and run it with AIGLX
to
> > avoid the black window bug.
> >
> > The only advantage is it looks pretty. There's no real benefit to using
it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread