Re: [gentoo-alpha] glibc 2.5+

[Davide Cittaro <davide.cittaro@ifom-ieo-campus.it>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1658 bytes --]


On May 28, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Bryan Østergaard wrote:

> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Davide Cittaro wrote:
>> Hi all, I've found that glibc 2.5+ cannot be compiled on my alpha, as
>> reported on gentoo bugzilla by another person.
>>
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179353
>>
>> I have a couple of questions, then:
>> 1- it is safe to use '-nptlonly' flag?
> Not really. In the past we've found Linuxthreads to be unstable and
> nptlonly is much preferred for that reason (we had programs randomly
> crashing with Linuxthreads and no problems with NPTL).
>

After 1 hour of building I've discovered that glibc doesn't compile  
even without nptlonly flag

>> 2- when the patched glibc will be available in portage (comment 2 of
>> that bug has been posted  one week ago)?
> As soon as glibc upstream fixes the problem. Meanwhile you have two
> different options.
>
> 1. Upgrade to binutils >=2.17.50.0.15 and risk possible unknown bugs
> from doing so.
> 2. Ignoring glibc-2.5 updates until upstream fixes the issue.
>
> My recommendation would be to wait and not try to work around the  
> issue
> yourself.

Unfortunately I have strict times and this general system update has  
been scheduled for this week. Since glibc-2.5-r2 is marked stable on  
alpha I thought I wouldn't run into such issues... :-(
If I upgrade binutils can I use both nptl* flags?

d

/*
Davide Cittaro
HPC and Bioinformatics Systems @ Informatics Core

IFOM - Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare
via adamello, 16
20139 Milano
Italy

tel.: +39(02)574303007
e-mail: davide.cittaro@ifom-ieo-campus.it
*/



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7700 bytes --]