From: "Jean-Sébastien Guay" <jean_seb@videotron.ca>
To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] 2.6 kernel on Alpha ?
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:01:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43780BFD.90505@videotron.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511131959.jADJxFK22049@acrm408.wh.lucent.com>
Hello Matthew,
>I am able to compile and boot a UP kernel, but I continuously
>get these messages on screen during boot and later in the
>system logs
>
>[kernel] sd 0:0:0:0: M_REJECT to send for : 1-2-3-1.
>
>seems to come from the SCSI SYM53C8XX_2 driver which handles the
>Symbios 53c810 controller chip. I am using these settings in
>the kernel config
>CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_2=y
>CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_DMA_ADDRESSING_MODE=0
>CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_DEFAULT_TAGS=16
>CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_MAX_TAGS=16
># CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_IOMAPPED is not set
>(I tried using IOMAPPED and different DMA modes and number of TAGs
>also, but the message still shows up)
>
>in 2.4.30, the driver version is sym-2.1.17a and it works fine
>(without any of these REJECT messages), while 2.6.12.5, the
>driver version is 2.2.x I believe.
>
>does anyone on the list know of an issue which could cause this ?
>is the REJECT message a cause for concern ? (system seem to work
>fine as before)
>
>
I have this problem with my SYM53C810 controller too, and the only
solution I've found (that worked) was to manually modify the kernel's
SCSI driver. See this page for the details :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2005/05/msg00041.html
From what I understand (which may well be a simplistic understanding of
the real situation), the problem is that the drive connected to the
controller is FAST-WIDE SCSI 2, but the controller can't do WIDE. The
driver tries to set it to WIDE, then send some data to see if it works,
and should fail (the second if in the code in the above page) but
doesn't, so the controller is left in WIDE mode even though it doesn't
support it and that's why it gives those messages. The mystery is why
the WIDE mode transfer doesn't fail as it should.
What I've done is comment out the whole section of code (starting with
the if right after the /* test width */ comment and ending with the
closing curly brace for that if) and then compile the kernel. That way
the driver never sets the controller to WIDE mode at all. Works great.
I'd really like someone to find a more sophisticated solution that
commenting out the whole lot, maybe fixing the test that should fail but
doesn't? Unfortunately my knowledge of Linux kernel drivers is too
limited to do that.
This modification affects the SCSI driver, though, which in my case
isn't a problem since I'm only using this controller, but if your
machine has another controller that should support WIDE mode, then this
change will probably affect it too... Watch out for that.
I wonder also why the patch YosWinK pointed to affects a totally
different source file... I'm not sure it's the same problem, because I'm
on the RedHat-Alpha mailing list too and haven't heard of this specific
problem. Perhaps it addresses another problem in the 53C810 code on Alpha.
Other than that minor problem, I've been running a 2.6 kernel for a
couple months now on my AlphaXL 366 with a 50GB SCSI-2 drive. Runs
great. Of course, it's a single processor machine so I can't help you
with the other problem you're having.
Hope this helps,
J-S
--
___________________________________________
Jean-Sébastien Guay jean_seb@videotron.ca
http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-14 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-13 19:59 [gentoo-alpha] 2.6 kernel on Alpha ? mathewt
2005-11-13 21:23 ` Jose Luis Rivero (YosWinK)
2005-11-14 2:52 ` Brian C. Parkhurst
2005-11-14 4:01 ` Jean-Sébastien Guay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43780BFD.90505@videotron.ca \
--to=jean_seb@videotron.ca \
--cc=gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox