From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13268 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 21:25:05 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 26 Oct 2004 21:25:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CMYoT-0006s0-1K for arch-gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:25:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 25868 invoked by uid 89); 26 Oct 2004 21:25:04 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 12490 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2004 21:25:04 +0000 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:22:06 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-267139283-70696d656e7473656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1098825903-076830255232-v4.0.7 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20041026212206.GE11400@time.flatmonk.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org References: <20041026102034.8ockoskgw8088go8@webmail.spamcop.net> <20041026201508.10484.qmail@web41306.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041026201508.10484.qmail@web41306.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] ebuild update for Xorg-x11 X-Archives-Salt: 986e18c5-d8ca-409d-9374-3358a445aa0a X-Archives-Hash: 4eda7c779650167b2e7a7332404be30a --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Jeff Donsbach wrote:[Tue Oct 26 2004, 04:15:08PM EDT] > What is that "-mtune" without an argument? It should have something > like "-mtune=ev56" or "-mtune=ev6" after it, depending on your > machine. Though, we are talking about Gentoo here, so > "-mcpu=" is probably the better option to use. In any > case, I am surprised gcc didn't complain about the existing flags. ALLOWED_FLAGS is a variable used by strip-flags in flag-o-matic.eclass. strip-flags understands -flag=* stuff. http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBfr/+JrHF4yAQTrARAoF5AJ0a7EsMEb6dPWSmyi5lQEgrxnqlTACgtxtB DduItwiRW6XZ+XDCreOHaKA= =WO2g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7qSK/uQB79J36Y4o--