public inbox for gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-alpha] another Portage problem
@ 2004-10-21 19:39 Jeff Donsbach
  2004-10-21 20:02 ` Brian Parkhurst
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Donsbach @ 2004-10-21 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-alpha


just emerged the 2.0.51 Portage update. During the
update, I got the message:

 * Checking //var/lib/portage for bad/illegal files:
ln: accessing `../../lib/portage/world': No such file
or directory


Anyone think this is a problem?




		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [gentoo-alpha] another Portage problem
  2004-10-21 19:39 [gentoo-alpha] another Portage problem Jeff Donsbach
@ 2004-10-21 20:02 ` Brian Parkhurst
  2004-10-21 22:53   ` Jeff Donsbach
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Parkhurst @ 2004-10-21 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: 'Jeff Donsbach', gentoo-alpha

It was the same problem I had with my server 10 days ago.  The new portage
re-did the /var/cache/edb to /var/lib/portage/

Here's a snippet from the gentoo site.

FHS compliance

This new Portage release introduces some file relocations:

    * The virtuals file (/var/cache/edb/virtuals) is no longer used. It is
now calculated transparently.
    * The world-file is now located inside /var/lib/portage instead of
/var/cache/edb.
    * /etc/portage/profile/virtuals is for user configurations only.

Thanks to the relocation of the world-file and dynamic checking of the
virtuals, Portage is now FHS-compliant. For instance, data within /var/cache
can be removed at will - it is actually cache data now.

You can read more:
http://www.gentoo.org/news/20041021-portage51.xml

Brian Parkhurst
brianp@prodigy.net
www.pyrobrian.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Donsbach [mailto:jeff_donsbach@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 12:40 PM
To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-alpha] another Portage problem


just emerged the 2.0.51 Portage update. During the
update, I got the message:

 * Checking //var/lib/portage for bad/illegal files:
ln: accessing `../../lib/portage/world': No such file
or directory


Anyone think this is a problem?




		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list



--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [gentoo-alpha] another Portage problem
  2004-10-21 20:02 ` Brian Parkhurst
@ 2004-10-21 22:53   ` Jeff Donsbach
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Donsbach @ 2004-10-21 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-alpha

Thanks, Brian. I assume messages like the following
are also related? -

QA Notice: ECLASS 'eutils' inherited illegally in
x11-misc/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-r1


QA Notice: ECLASS 'flag-o-matic' inherited illegally
in x11-misc/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-r1


QA Notice: ECLASS 'toolchain-funcs' inherited
illegally in x11-misc/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-r1


QA Notice: ECLASS 'gcc' inherited illegally in
x11-misc/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-r1

Jeff D



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-21 22:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-21 19:39 [gentoo-alpha] another Portage problem Jeff Donsbach
2004-10-21 20:02 ` Brian Parkhurst
2004-10-21 22:53   ` Jeff Donsbach

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox