From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21859 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 18:27:14 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 18:27:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aw3kY-0007Ks-0F for arch-gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:27:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 5004 invoked by uid 50004); 25 Feb 2004 18:27:13 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24731 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 18:27:12 +0000 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:30:49 -0600 From: Jay Maynard To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040225183049.GA18436@thebrain.conmicro.cx> References: <71650A6F73F1D411BE8000805F65E3CB3B395C@SRV-03> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <71650A6F73F1D411BE8000805F65E3CB3B395C@SRV-03> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources X-Archives-Salt: cfdf63c3-c66b-4512-8693-8e10146a3a46 X-Archives-Hash: 5fd4fc684f952b99869dbc81591864a5 On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:25:15PM -0500, jwsacksteder@ramprecision.com wrote: > Considering the recent security issues, I want to move up to 2.4.25. It > looks like I'm stuck with vanilla-sources unless someone is planning on > updating alpha-sources soon. I'm currently working on building a new LiveCD, but once that's done, I'd be willing to look at this one. Just what was done to vanilla-sources to get to alpha-sources? -- gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list