From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-alpha-return-322-arch-gentoo-alpha=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 25838 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 16:21:47 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39)
  by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Feb 2004 16:21:47 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Aprgo-0002is-Um
	for arch-gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2004 16:21:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 22840 invoked by uid 50004); 8 Feb 2004 16:21:46 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-alpha-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-alpha-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-alpha.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 10651 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2004 16:21:46 +0000
X-Authenticated: #1226656
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:21:43 +0100
From: Marc Giger <gigerstyle@gmx.ch>
To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org
Message-Id: <20040208172143.5e390b08.gigerstyle@gmx.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20040208053747.GA31935@time>
References: <20040205001330.1f25a0d2.gigerstyle@gmx.ch>
	<20040206035536.GF24534@time>
	<20040206201411.6c1d5291.gigerstyle@gmx.ch>
	<20040207004051.GA20928@time>
	<20040207130956.45482eea.gigerstyle@gmx.ch>
	<20040208053747.GA31935@time>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] glibc-2.3.2-decc-compaq.patch
X-Archives-Salt: f5ede7cf-8c90-4d0f-876a-1224846cbff2
X-Archives-Hash: 8ac3826a219bc0ea7ac13734616d7e8a

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:37:47 -0500
Aron Griffis <agriffis@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Marc Giger wrote:	[Sat Feb 07 2004, 07:09:56AM EST]
> > It seems there has nothing changed. ccc-6.5.9.001-r1.ebuild gives me
> > the same result. Do I something wrong?
> 
> No, I just didn't really understand the problem before.  Thanks for
> explaining it.  I think it should work now in -r2  :-)

Can you do the same thing on cxx? I think it needs the same fix.

Thanks and greets

Marc

--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list