From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24583 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2004 00:40:59 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Feb 2004 00:40:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ApGWp-0006gd-GY for arch-gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 00:40:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 15808 invoked by uid 50004); 7 Feb 2004 00:40:59 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26386 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2004 00:40:58 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:40:51 -0500 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20040207004051.GA20928@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org References: <20040205001330.1f25a0d2.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> <20040206035536.GF24534@time> <20040206201411.6c1d5291.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040206201411.6c1d5291.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] glibc-2.3.2-decc-compaq.patch X-Archives-Salt: f1a76aed-5a0f-4451-a7b7-179cb1a710fb X-Archives-Hash: 12960598215e3f24a86ffada4a2b4a86 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc Giger wrote: [Fri Feb 06 2004, 02:14:11PM EST] > Yeah, it looks like:-) but I was wrong... I removed this check and ran > into troubles. The Macro __GLIBC_HAVE_LONG_LONG must not be defined > with ccc. So this check is totally ok! It has nothing to do with > "long long". Sorry... I was searching for the reason why I couldn't > compile python with ccc. > After some time I found it! The attached patch solves the problem. Now > I'm running python 2.3 compiled with ccc:-) Oh good! > > > printf '%s %s %s\n' \ > > > "-L${gcc_libs_path}" \ > > > " -SysIncDir > > > /usr/lib/compaq/ccc-${ccc_release}/alpha-linux/include" \ = =20 > > > =20 > > > " -SysIncDir /usr/include/linux" \ > > > > usr/lib/compaq/ccc-${ccc_release}/alpha-linux/bin/comp.config > >=20 > > So do you know how this should be changed exactly? >=20 > Hehe, no!=20 > This seems not to be the right place neither. I think this is useless > anyway. The right place to fix it is in "create-comp-config.sh". I tried > to change it but it seems that a shell-script and regex guru is > needed;-) The same should be changed by cxx (preventing). >=20 > With these two fixes, I'm able to compile a lot more packages with the > compaq compiler. I'll take a look at create-comp-config.sh > Oh, while we are at it. What do you think if we move the libots libs to > /lib instead of /usr/lib ? Sounds good to me. Done. Try out 2.2.7-r1. If it works for you then I'll mark it stable. > Lastly, I ran into troubles as I compiled gawk with ccc.=20 > Could you imagine what happens? I've made a RAID array with several > partitions on it. One partition was /usr. > gawk is needed in the init scripts, but libots.so is located in > /usr/lib, which is not mounted yet. Too bad. Ugh :-( Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim) Key fingerprint =3D E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAJDQTJrHF4yAQTrARAqUrAKDOVfFyAp6fBlE+SmTAPXXNX9ghQgCggx6q UFNlTmj84cyQuMyaZW+1mBY= =Eruv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF--