From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2316 invoked by uid 1002); 10 Dec 2003 13:15:45 -0600 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28564 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 13:15:43 -0600 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:15:39 -0500 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20031210191539.GC29912@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org References: <20031210190804.16177088.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031210190804.16177088.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] grsec patch for 2.4.23 with XFS X-Archives-Salt: 8023e66e-1bf3-4176-a36d-50d0a66fb79a X-Archives-Hash: b3c56aba3029af44d9d7b7397fabe9fe --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marc Giger wrote: [Wed Dec 10 2003, 01:08:04PM EST] > For all who want to use XFS and grsecurity together, I've made a rediff > of grsecurity to 2.4.23 So would we lose any functionality by providing an alpha-sources that uses this patch? I.e. is there anything else in alpha-sources-2.4.21-r2 that would be missing from 2.4.23 with this patch? Aron --=20 Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim) Key fingerprint =3D E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0 --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/13DbJrHF4yAQTrARAiXRAJ0QYPkKD6y4k3wEWVH13VBqPBBhHACfQpW7 0pRFlvzXOnDsrWU6+SJxopU= =V+mu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uh9ZiVrAOUUm9fzH--