From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-alpha-return-263-arch-gentoo-alpha=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 12728 invoked by uid 1002); 9 Dec 2003 10:01:38 -0600
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-alpha-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-alpha-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-alpha.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 25042 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 10:01:37 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
From: Sigurd Stordal <sigurd.stordal@stud.ibg.uit.no>
To: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:01:35 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200312091701.37035.sigurd.stordal@stud.ibg.uit.no>
X-Virus-Scanned: : ok
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36
Subject: [gentoo-alpha] The use of compaq compilers ccc and cxx.
X-Archives-Salt: 92161ed7-54a8-4c71-a6de-9b4ecc3f72b3
X-Archives-Hash: 4150f97faf1c5a421e95875a0d288258

I've just loaded this compilers, and I just wonder if anyone else has use=
d=20
them, any packages that don't enjoy this compilers. Are they really very =
much=20
better than gcc.
--=20
Sigurd Stordal
master in Petrology/mineralogy
President of GOGS
Opuscreator VS in DNM95

--
gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list