From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30491 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 17:56:16 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (128.193.0.39) by eagle.gentoo.oregonstate.edu with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 May 2004 17:56:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([128.193.0.34] helo=eagle.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BLn6W-0000iv-Ey for arch-gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 17:56:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 22888 invoked by uid 50004); 6 May 2004 17:56:16 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-alpha-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14248 invoked from network); 6 May 2004 17:56:15 +0000 Message-ID: <10360.65.200.133.233.1083866172.squirrel@mail.atl.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <1083826079.23337.2.camel@localhost> References: <1083826079.23337.2.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 13:56:12 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jeff Donsbach" To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gentoo.org, Bryan =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8stergaard?= User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] Samba build problem revisited X-Archives-Salt: 9b0a5ea6-b42d-4f35-8aaa-fa48d5da3919 X-Archives-Hash: 57f10d40515dd396c7a79c0a547491b4 > Hi Jeff. > > I haven't test samba-2.2.8 but I marked 3.0.2a-r2 stable a few days ago > - it works for me but let me know if you still have problems building > samba. > > Regards, > Bryan Østergaard I was trying to build 3.0.2a-r2 . It does not build "out of the box" on my machine. I had to modify the ebuild file to apply the "samba-2.2.8.patch", just like it does for Sparc and PPC (look at the build script to see what I mean). Once I did that, it builds fine (though I haven't tried configuring and running yet). Why would it build for you but not me? Do your system header files have some magic patch to them making the "samba-2.2.8.patch" file unnecessary? I'm a bit perplexed. Thanks, Jeff D -- gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list