From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D20138714 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E76F21C006; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ye0-f177.google.com (mail-ye0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC23221C006 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m14so437042yen.8 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:47:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=oxm7vYNt2mqlw1mD2g0LSarrLg8QZKc9bpG2TVPWwZI=; b=0ULnrRrYWyRKO+arTpcv71IDkGIIsQpquFPbqAXSfiqWisCur4mQhumca60Sx0RGW5 9zHCF6GjPq/f/Bk194f4DNdcsTuVZCZgvF0Yw94f9oFm2vz1e+aY84g4RTK/GI7Xy3wq ImK1m/MotN+xRRfsDZ1e/kliIrgebU9tmtEgSfaiblMJL2eUEq+HgtFWqf2rE114o4Gj bAQfUfMXt+K129im9lYpmLDZ5liHt4dn5U1vG2W7WeS3yDo/MGFrc+uy3Uyre+C4wQ2O D1F7VYxol0BHmKTe+TSo5Xi6uViApi4R5hpFGcMz+j0pop++fgby2rVbahGTdRrGbKBz Qapw== X-Received: by 10.101.179.26 with SMTP id g26mr4549252anp.7.1359395274058; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:47:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-140.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.57.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j26sm5863757ani.6.2013.01.28.09.47.52 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:47:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5106B9C7.1070805@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:47:51 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: eudev mailing list X-BeenThere: eudev@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: eudev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eudev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [eudev] eudev-1_beta2-r1 fails configure References: <5106070C.3080708@gmail.com> <51061185.4060709@gmail.com> <51067E8C.9000404@gentoo.org> <51068E47.5010502@gmail.com> <510691ED.1070800@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <510691ED.1070800@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010409070807040309010901" X-Archives-Salt: 3daf2bb5-a651-4138-8bc9-b583d886d992 X-Archives-Hash: 809b22564172afa71bc647224e415b33 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010409070807040309010901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 28/01/13 09:42 AM, Dale wrote: > > Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> [...] So per your config log above, USE="kmod" was set but for > >> whatever reason kmod wasn't installed. However, you could have > >> switched form m-i-t to kmod without adding USE="kmod" to eudev > >> and everything would continue to work. > >> > >> > > > Well, it was portage that told me to set the kmod USE flag. If > > portage hadn't told me to set it, for whatever reason it thinks it > > needs it, I wouldn't have set it. As to why it wants it set, I > > don't know. I was just following the instructions it provided. > > Was portage wrong, no clue. lol > > > Dale > > > Yeah that was an issue with the way the flags were set in the virtual. > That has now been fixed -- USE="kmod" is no longer forced on by > virtual/udev. > > Ahhh, ok. I'm no guru but when I run into something, I'll post here, including any work a rounds I find. Sometimes I run into things that are not really broken so I don't generally file roach reports unless I know for sure. Thanks for the good work tho. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! --------------010409070807040309010901 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 28/01/13 09:42 AM, Dale wrote:
> > Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >> [...] So per your config log above, USE="kmod" was set but for
> >> whatever reason kmod wasn't installed. However, you could have
> >> switched form m-i-t to kmod without adding USE="kmod" to eudev
> >> and everything would continue to work.
> >>
> >>
>
> > Well, it was portage that told me to set the kmod USE flag. If
> > portage hadn't told me to set it, for whatever reason it thinks it
> > needs it, I wouldn't have set it. As to why it wants it set, I
> > don't know. I was just following the instructions it provided.
> > Was portage wrong, no clue. lol
>
> > Dale
>
>
> Yeah that was an issue with the way the flags were set in the virtual.
> That has now been fixed -- USE="kmod" is no longer forced on by
> virtual/udev.
>
>

Ahhh, ok.  I'm no guru but when I run into something, I'll post here, including any work a rounds I find.  Sometimes I run into things that are not really broken so I don't generally file roach reports unless I know for sure.

Thanks for the good work tho.

Dale

:-)  :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

--------------010409070807040309010901--