From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85441385EA for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFEB521C036; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ye0-f179.google.com (mail-ye0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2568D21C036 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 07:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ye0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m4so1052840yen.38 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:18:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/uoXy0hKWVT0Ufqi1yaO9iX1KEEPwYlVfSDGZ9oGCYU=; b=qoEyFp+fxWfivA5nvC169MHX9hhqCjeyZs3b6jyStt6bU738xnvGjC2bAJq+wAVUa9 6nA2cL6Q7btJSPKwTcWN//u3o8zr6zY/uf5ZxYCnQityR5bKnYtwuUKZVzKXjVkcKYS/ xUXCOX+N/sfpLcGwkdimld4MhU70Qrn78kpqnkdjJv+82wxM+57558tjnyXnpvSfpBzs H3FTNSSPsDv0H2gKdMrsTez6VOMemx/meGlTT7tk1ivRb9fVNaoqOSK1dfp96uCT3e6o 74AsrVTwEiq9cEIo5qkSWTrV2ER9H/f37hwf/9/ztXbR+0r5PrWs041c4Ig/hqH+l3fK DG5A== X-Received: by 10.236.193.9 with SMTP id j9mr22954917yhn.118.1358839108263; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:18:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-140.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.57.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x8sm5018898ang.20.2013.01.21.23.18.26 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:18:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50FE3D42.7080505@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:18:26 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: eudev mailing list X-BeenThere: eudev@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: eudev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eudev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [eudev] Is it ready now? References: <50FB72D0.90006@gmail.com> <50FBCBFD.4000109@gentoo.org> <50FC2F1C.707@gmail.com> <50FC36C2.5050105@opensource.dyc.edu> <50FC84EF.1080104@gmail.com> <50FD005A.8000007@gmail.com> <50FD338A.4020400@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <50FD338A.4020400@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f511a7c4-f897-4c49-a259-ceb18ee44c03 X-Archives-Hash: db1797c0b5c7674d2320828f10e60c58 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 01/21/2013 03:46 AM, Dale wrote: >> OK. I went with the idea that the udev USE flag would work with either >> package. So, I switched. I only noticed one thing that could possibly, >> maybe, sort of need fixing. I had dracut emerged. I was building the >> init thingy until eudev came along. Anyway, it seems that dracut >> insists on having udev and eudev is not a option for some reason. I >> found this in the ebuild: >> >> CDEPEND=">sys-fs/udev-166 >> dracut_modules_systemd? ( sys-apps/systemd ) >> " >> >> Shouldn't that either depend on the virtual udev or something instead of >> only on udev itself? Sort of let eudev be a option too? >> >> Other than that, works fine. It took me a minute to get my >> mask/unmask/keyword files sorted but works fine. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> >> P. S. No reboot needed either. I did the switch in the boot runlevel. >> When it was done, just stopped and restarted udev then went back to >> default runlevel. >> > It should be the virtual. Can you manually change it to > >=virtual/udev-171 and see if dracut builds correctly. If so you > should open a bug or ping me back. > Sorry it took me a bit. I changed to what you posted and did a emerge -vp dracut. It did NOT want to pull in udev. It was satisfied with eudev after that change. So, that does need fixing. You want to file bug or you going to talk to the maintainer for a correction? Doesn't matter to me. Thanks much. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!