From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F5B1385A1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3FEF21C00E; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com (mail-yh0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ACA321C00E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z20so229159yhz.16 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:53:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=or3T4FN/S+mvy9WS6TYtxUt0XtYEWoOs7fP4N127368=; b=mfm1MtB/wxhbum11l2Bt1H+elcIT40azrvh4zpE6pz6U4x98fikrTrJTrmD6CRIMLP pUYEkOIUofxXizQKW0+UxypNiIDoJmb8wU1D0Wk1MfkedWD2EjolmaZmRALFYRAoGY0P fBAX8lE0BFnp7atXX4YB7p6ZBgbqdaCfugiwJe33kUVnGWlbezPyqH4oDSeinqCqm8Tl dVB/xjgiWkH7Xngpig1fM+88n6MpiTv30XPPtZBAv0DzChYixY1gnOQJ9941ilJI+y57 GY6rKAJp33mhKXEzb0qXrf2tDtwZiPMm+r19T7kUr6X++0eig5lztVx3gnE5G+bhT3Sa xdZw== X-Received: by 10.236.156.194 with SMTP id m42mr2747264yhk.6.1358704414466; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-140.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.57.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t3sm9567534ane.4.2013.01.20.09.53.32 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:53:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50FC2F1C.707@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:53:32 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: eudev mailing list X-BeenThere: eudev@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: eudev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eudev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [eudev] Is it ready now? References: <50FB72D0.90006@gmail.com> <50FBCBFD.4000109@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <50FBCBFD.4000109@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d78eebb1-bb95-498e-90fe-c0fffafd36b2 X-Archives-Hash: 2c9af3c4bf09391351efe20000b46869 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 01/19/2013 11:30 PM, Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I just synced my tree and it appears udev wants to upgrade. I have a >> separate /usr on lvm and really want to avoid udev that COULD break >> things. I have a init thingy but not sure if it will pass the test or >> not. >> >> Is eudev ready for people to switch to? I use KDE, latest in the tree. >> Other than that, nothing special really. I'm amd64. >> >> Thoughts? Things I should look out for? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Dale >> >> :-) :-) >> > > eudev is ready. It has not been tested in every situation so there > are unknown issues but this is true of systemd-udev also. I've been > running eudev-1_beta1-r2 on a gnome desktop for a while with no > issues. I'm running it on a few servers. > So it is as simple as unmerging udev and emerging eudev? Do I need to reboot afterwards or is it sufficient to go to boot runlevel, kill anything udev related and then go back to default runlevel? I have done this in the past with udev so I know udev restarts when it switches to default runlevel from boot runlevel. Thanks much for the reply. Also, thanks for the work on eudev. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!