From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eudev+bounces-8-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F5B1385A1
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3FEF21C00E;
	Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com (mail-yh0-f43.google.com [209.85.213.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ACA321C00E
	for <eudev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z20so229159yhz.16
        for <eudev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:53:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=or3T4FN/S+mvy9WS6TYtxUt0XtYEWoOs7fP4N127368=;
        b=mfm1MtB/wxhbum11l2Bt1H+elcIT40azrvh4zpE6pz6U4x98fikrTrJTrmD6CRIMLP
         pUYEkOIUofxXizQKW0+UxypNiIDoJmb8wU1D0Wk1MfkedWD2EjolmaZmRALFYRAoGY0P
         fBAX8lE0BFnp7atXX4YB7p6ZBgbqdaCfugiwJe33kUVnGWlbezPyqH4oDSeinqCqm8Tl
         dVB/xjgiWkH7Xngpig1fM+88n6MpiTv30XPPtZBAv0DzChYixY1gnOQJ9941ilJI+y57
         GY6rKAJp33mhKXEzb0qXrf2tDtwZiPMm+r19T7kUr6X++0eig5lztVx3gnE5G+bhT3Sa
         xdZw==
X-Received: by 10.236.156.194 with SMTP id m42mr2747264yhk.6.1358704414466;
        Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:53:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-140.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.57.140])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t3sm9567534ane.4.2013.01.20.09.53.32
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50FC2F1C.707@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 11:53:32 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:eudev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eudev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:eudev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:eudev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: eudev mailing list <eudev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: eudev@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: eudev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: eudev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [eudev] Is it ready now?
References: <50FB72D0.90006@gmail.com> <50FBCBFD.4000109@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <50FBCBFD.4000109@gentoo.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: d78eebb1-bb95-498e-90fe-c0fffafd36b2
X-Archives-Hash: 2c9af3c4bf09391351efe20000b46869

Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 01/19/2013 11:30 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I just synced my tree and it appears udev wants to upgrade.  I have a
>> separate /usr on lvm and really want to avoid udev that COULD break
>> things.  I have a init thingy but not sure if it will pass the test or
>> not.
>>
>> Is eudev ready for people to switch to?  I use KDE, latest in the tree.
>> Other than that, nothing special really.  I'm amd64.
>>
>> Thoughts?  Things I should look out for?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)
>>
>
> eudev is ready.  It has not been tested in every situation so there
> are unknown issues but this is true of systemd-udev also.  I've been
> running eudev-1_beta1-r2 on a gnome desktop for a while with no
> issues.  I'm running it on a few servers.
>

So it is as simple as unmerging udev and emerging eudev?  Do I need to
reboot afterwards or is it sufficient to go to boot runlevel, kill
anything udev related and then go back to default runlevel?   I have
done this in the past with udev so I know udev restarts when it switches
to default runlevel from boot runlevel. 

Thanks much for the reply.  Also, thanks for the work on eudev. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!