From: Christian Bricart <christian@bricart.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Arch Status and Future Plans
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:29:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efd87a30-ff86-4104-9540-0776c07b711b@bricart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a30daaac-d1c5-46ca-b1f0-63db08a8d7de@gentoo.org>
Am 26.06.24 um 09:38 schrieb Florian Schmaus:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> thanks for taking the time to write this mail.
>
> On 25/06/2024 19.33, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
>> ======== x86 ========
>>
>> Stable 32-bit arch. I'll be honest, I don't believe at all this should
>> be stable arch anymore.
>
> I have the impression as well. The time to drop stable keywords for x86
> probably has come. But I always wonder if there is a x86 use-case we are
> not aware of. Therefore, if there is a group of x86 Gentoo users out
> there, then they should speak now and ideally elaborate a bit on their
> use case.
well - at least *I* am running x86 on a bunch of Intel Atom boards
(-march=bonnell, "Diamondville") which are mostly purposed as routers,
but also keeping some of those early "Netbooks" based on that processor
alive.
All equipped with (the platform's max of) 2 Gi RAM, they still suit
their purpose well…
Cheers
Christian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 17:33 [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans Arthur Zamarin
2024-06-25 21:40 ` matoro
2024-06-25 22:55 ` James Le Cuirot
2024-06-26 0:06 ` Notion of stable depgraph vs stable keywords (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans) Sam James
2024-06-28 4:17 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Notion of stable depgraph vs stable keywords (Re: " Duncan
2024-06-28 5:16 ` Sam James
2024-06-26 0:14 ` Misc arch plans (Re: [gentoo-dev] " Sam James
2024-06-26 20:29 ` ia64, was: " Andreas K. Huettel
2024-06-26 20:45 ` matoro
2024-06-26 0:17 ` On the value (or not?) of stable keywords " Sam James
2024-06-26 0:19 ` time64 & LFS for 32-bit arches " Sam James
2024-06-26 0:20 ` x86 FP issues " Sam James
2024-06-28 5:20 ` Michał Górny
2024-06-26 7:38 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Arch Status and Future Plans Florian Schmaus
2024-06-26 8:29 ` Christian Bricart [this message]
2024-06-26 20:44 ` Immolo
2024-06-26 19:47 ` nomenclature, was: Re: [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
2024-06-26 20:18 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-06-26 20:24 ` riscv, was: " Andreas K. Huettel
2024-06-26 21:08 ` 32bit vs 64bit, " Andreas K. Huettel
2024-06-28 16:12 ` splitting keywords, " Andreas K. Huettel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efd87a30-ff86-4104-9540-0776c07b711b@bricart.de \
--to=christian@bricart.de \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox