public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New hard drive. Is this normal? It looks like a connect problem.
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 15:47:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDm3BSmVHURrjS1C@q> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6056060.MhkbZ0Pkbq@rogueboard>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1248 bytes --]

Am Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:56:24AM +0100 schrieb Michael:

> > According to that, it is connected at udma6 which is the fastest.  So
> > that is good, I guess.  Since both drives is slow to connect, it seems
> > this is a trend and may just be normal for these drives.  Given I use
> > these for data that is only put in use a few minutes after booting,
> > which gives it plenty of time to connect properly, then it isn't a
> > problem for me.  I just wouldn't want to try to put a OS on the thing
> > and boot from it. 
> > 
> > Any one else have different thoughts?  See a problem that is a trend, in
> > a bad way?  Given two different drives has the same slow connect time,
> > maybe it is normal. 

> You can transfer some data from a tmpfs and measure the speed.  If it gets 
> anywhere near 4.8 Gbit/s (600 MB/s) its a SATA 3.

But only on a fast SSD. An HDD does not reach this speed at all. I have a 
USB3 to M.2 SATA enclosure with an SSD inside and I get around 400 MB/s for 
sequential transfers of big video files. I guess the SSD doesn’t get any 
faster.

-- 
Grüße | Greetings | Salut | Qapla’
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network.

Blue is greener than yellow.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-30 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-05 21:15 [gentoo-user] New hard drive. Is this normal? It looks like a connect problem Dale
2025-05-06 12:12 ` Michael
2025-05-06 12:59   ` Dale
2025-05-06 14:31     ` Michael
2025-05-06 20:51       ` Dale
2025-05-06 23:08         ` Wol
2025-05-07  0:16           ` Dale
2025-05-06 23:30         ` Dale
2025-05-07  8:18           ` Michael
2025-05-07 15:13             ` Dale
2025-05-10 15:53               ` Dale
2025-05-10 18:52                 ` Michael
2025-05-12  8:11                   ` Dale
2025-05-12 11:14                     ` Michael
2025-05-13  6:30                       ` Dale
2025-05-12 22:34             ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-05-13  6:05               ` Dale
2025-05-13  8:30               ` Michael
2025-05-30 13:46     ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-05-30  1:25 ` Dale
2025-05-30 10:56   ` Michael
2025-05-30 13:47     ` Frank Steinmetzger [this message]
2025-05-30 15:10       ` Michael
2025-05-30 21:06     ` Dale
2025-05-31  8:21       ` Michael
2025-06-01  2:51         ` Dale
2025-06-01 11:02           ` Frank Steinmetzger
2025-06-01 12:20             ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aDm3BSmVHURrjS1C@q \
    --to=warp_7@gmx.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox