public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:14:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85a7ff62c353e13e2c2c8c93b7c90282d6d1f045.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0EP43J-nuBopP9w9Q86vMpNq_7uCMkJ9cXjsKmfBDdY97UkQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 11:10 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 4:23 AM Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 02:35 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > > Modifying an existing user is a bad default and makes Gentoo
> > > special because it is common for system administrators to make
> > > modifications to user (i.e. putting an user into another service's
> > > group to allow that user to access service in question) and it
> > > would be unexpected to see these changes reverted during normal
> > > world upgrade (which could break services).
> > 
> > Not modifying an existing user is a horrible default that has already
> > bricked one system (by removing /dev/null).  So, over my dead commit
> > access.
> 
> As the eclass maintainer, would you be willing to merge a similar
> patch that enables user modifications by default, but provides
> sysadmins a way to disable it?

Yes, I don't mind an option, as long as it spews a big fat ewarn that
the user loses the right to support.  However, that's still not
the right solution to the immediate problem, and I'm currently working
on a better patch, so I'd prefer if you waited with that to avoid merge
conflicts.


-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny




  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-04 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-04  1:35 [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04  2:41 ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-04  3:17   ` Alec Warner
2021-01-04  3:18 ` Michael Orlitzky
2021-01-04 14:46   ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 15:24     ` Michael Orlitzky
2021-01-04 15:55       ` David Seifert
2021-01-04 16:18         ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 16:28           ` Michał Górny
2021-01-04 16:30             ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 16:34               ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 16:38                 ` Michał Górny
2021-01-04 16:50                   ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 16:56                     ` Michał Górny
2021-01-04 16:56                     ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-04 16:54                 ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-04  7:32 ` Robin H. Johnson
2021-01-04 16:45   ` [gentoo-dev] " James Cloos
2021-01-04 18:07     ` Michael Orlitzky
2021-01-04 18:20       ` Michał Górny
2021-01-04 18:38         ` Michael Orlitzky
2021-01-04 18:23       ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 18:27         ` Michael Orlitzky
2021-01-04 18:32           ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04  9:23 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2021-01-04 14:05   ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-04 16:10   ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-04 16:14     ` Michał Górny [this message]
2021-01-04 16:20       ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-08 18:11       ` Fabian Groffen
2021-01-08 18:14         ` Michał Górny
2021-01-08 18:23           ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-08 18:32             ` Michał Górny
2021-01-08 15:48 ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-08 16:03   ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-08 16:29     ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-08 16:50       ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-08 17:06       ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-08 18:10         ` Thomas Deutschmann
2021-01-08 18:31           ` Michał Górny
2021-01-08 19:15             ` Mike Gilbert
2021-01-08 17:16       ` Michał Górny

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85a7ff62c353e13e2c2c8c93b7c90282d6d1f045.camel@gentoo.org \
    --to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox