From: "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-doc] [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:12:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43207EF8.3040102@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43207AF2.5060800@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 987 bytes --]
Xavier Neys wrote:
>> This implies manual changing of several files which is not good, IMHO.
>
>
> Why? We change a small number of docs once, then forget about them.
> Do you think it is better to introduce more code, more complexity to be
> maintained, more stuff to be executed on each and every doc request?
> Is that your definition of better?
I'm not familiar with inner workings of gorg/axkit and I don't know
anything about speed issues or expensiveness of XML transformations, sorry.
> If we mark some files as unmaintained, we're also telling our users that
> non-marked files *are* maintained.
Good point, but IMHO we are now telling that *everything* is maintained
("file is on gentoo.org -> it's official").
> You should try to think about feasibility, implementation & consequences
> first.
That's why I included "[RFC]" in the subject. I don't know if it is
possible and worth the effort, I'm just asking.
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-08 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-08 16:56 [gentoo-doc] [RFC] Marking unmaintained documents Jan Kundrát
2005-09-08 17:07 ` Xavier Neys
2005-09-08 17:36 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-08 17:54 ` Xavier Neys
2005-09-08 18:12 ` Jan Kundrát [this message]
2005-09-08 19:04 ` Shyam Mani
2005-09-09 17:00 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-09-09 16:57 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-09-10 13:10 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-10 18:22 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-09-10 20:26 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-14 16:55 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-09-14 18:20 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-08 21:00 ` Alexey Chumakov
2005-09-08 21:10 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-08 21:11 ` Łukasz Damentko
2005-09-09 1:13 ` Flammie Pirinen
2005-09-09 6:50 ` Alexey Chumakov
2005-09-09 13:10 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-09 13:08 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-09 15:49 ` Flammie Pirinen
2005-09-09 16:26 ` Łukasz Damentko
2005-09-10 13:11 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-09 16:50 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-09-10 12:35 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-15 11:51 ` Xavier Neys
2005-09-15 11:55 ` [gentoo-doc] " Xavier Neys
2005-09-16 13:01 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-17 12:06 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-09-19 7:51 ` Alexey Chumakov
2005-09-16 9:01 ` [gentoo-doc] " Xavier Neys
2005-09-16 13:07 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-16 15:24 ` Xavier Neys
2005-09-16 18:51 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-09-29 15:41 ` Xavier Neys
1980-01-03 20:09 ` Alexey Chumakov
2005-09-29 16:49 ` Jose Luis Rivero
2005-09-29 22:57 ` Łukasz Damentko
2005-09-30 7:20 ` Shyam Mani
2005-09-30 8:59 ` Flammie Pirinen
2005-09-30 16:29 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-10-02 13:11 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-10-09 10:21 ` Xavier Neys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43207EF8.3040102@gentoo.org \
--to=jkt@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox