public inbox for gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SK <yandereson@riseup.net>
To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 16:20:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29deca69-e059-feaf-a312-b0ae53e9610a@riseup.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170501135808.GA644@gentoo.org>

There is Subgraph that is going to keep maintaining 4.9.X LTS branch
with grsec & there is minipli[1] that is going to forward 4.9.X LTS
branch with grsec.

Would be great to join forces to keep 4.9.X LTS alive while porting
features upstream.

1.
https://github.com/minipli/linux-unofficial_grsec/tree/linux-4.9.x-unofficial_grsec


On 05/01/2017 03:58 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:

> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:28:54PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>> The obvious step is indeed to stop further *current* development on
>>> hardened-sources.
>> Why not support hardened-sources while corresponding vanilla
>> kernels are still supported? E.g. 4.9 is a longterm branch, so we
>> should be able to keep hardened-sources-4.9* up-to-date with
>> vanilla bugfixes. This will give a nice transition period for
>> hardened users.
> Transition to what exactly?
>
> There is one suggestion that mentions we would join forces with other
> projects "out there" to keep supporting the latest PaX patches. But this
> will require knowledgeable resources with enough time to do the necessary
> support on it.
>
> In my humble opinion, this is an effort which is not to be underestimated.
> Maintaining the upstream-provided patches within Gentoo is already an
> endeavour, and now we're talking about even taking on the patch content
> itself as well.
>
> If we have enough volunteers to do so, then let's do it. At least we can
> then have something for users to look forward to. If not, then the current
> long-term branch is also the latest, and the "transition period" is to allow
> users to move to a perhaps lesser kernel-hardened environment.
>
> Wkr,
>   Sven Vermeulen
>



  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-01 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-01  9:38 [gentoo-hardened] Technical repercussions of grsecurity removal Sven Vermeulen
2017-05-01  9:50 ` Sven Vermeulen
2017-05-01 10:24 ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-01 11:00   ` Andrew Savchenko
2017-05-01 12:25     ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-01 10:28 ` Andrew Savchenko
2017-05-01 13:58   ` Sven Vermeulen
2017-05-01 14:20     ` SK [this message]
2017-05-01 14:53       ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-01 15:21         ` SK
2017-05-02  8:28           ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-08 18:08             ` Miroslav Rovis
2017-05-08 18:57               ` Luis Ressel
2017-05-08 20:07               ` Mathias Krause
2017-05-08 20:49                 ` Miroslav Rovis
2017-05-08 23:31                   ` Miroslav Rovis
2017-05-09 14:28                     ` [gentoo-hardened] Unofficial grsec kernel install WAS: " Miroslav Rovis
2017-05-08 21:12     ` [gentoo-hardened] " Andrew Savchenko
2017-05-12 19:10       ` "Tóth Attila"
2017-05-12 23:38         ` Alex Efros
2017-05-13  0:17           ` Max R.D. Parmer
2017-05-02 15:28 ` Luis Ressel
2017-05-02 15:56   ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-02 16:02     ` Luis Ressel
2017-05-02 16:59       ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-02 17:23         ` "Tóth Attila"
2017-05-02 19:58           ` Daniel Cegiełka
2017-05-02 20:41             ` Alex Efros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29deca69-e059-feaf-a312-b0ae53e9610a@riseup.net \
    --to=yandereson@riseup.net \
    --cc=gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox